<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>HOOPLOG: Andrei Kirilenko</title>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/andrei-kirilenko/index.php</link>
<description>NBA basketball news, rumors, insider analysis and more from around the country.  Updated hourly by Team RxSN.</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:49:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Nothing fits forever</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <img src="http://static.flickr.com/36/109959901_a48711dc38_o.jpg"><br /><br />It would seem that last night’s infernal burst of Gilbertology might truly need no comment from ours truly. As in, we live in heaven, he lives alone, our souls are intertwined and the moment need not be soiled by explanation. The more and more I gazed upon that fascinating still—one as destined for iconic status as Tiger with the fist pump or Yao’s scream of antiquity—the more brutally apparent it becomes to me that Arenas, far from being an oddball, is the living, breathing god of my favorite kind of NBA player: the kind you watch, instead of just view. What Iverson, Kobe, Nash, and a handful of others I go out of my way to see play have in common is this ability to not merely produce on any given night, but to casually redefine themselves through masterstrokes of basketball impressionism. <br /><br /><img src="http://static.flickr.com/37/109959903_2461c59cda.jpg"><br /><br />Let me put briefly put aside the strained fire and brimstone that guides this site long enough to admit, as I did last week, that this is by and large a league of consistency. Unlike baseball and football, where one can be violently up and down from one game to the next but still get recognized overall as a fantastic contributor, to be a credible contributor a guy’s got to come with steady output. Freaks and streaks can be profound, but no player’s a recognizable force (or definite failure) in this league until he can be counted on; to scrape the ridges of Mount Dunkmore, he’d better be guaranteed to account for a serious percentage of his team’s production, both in the box score and as a reliable force when the ball hits his hands. Until then, he will always get saddled with the p-word, no matter how impressive he is in spurts. <br /><br />When you reach the rarified air of superlative hoops accomplishment, there are at least three kind of consistency. Most obviously, there are the rock-solid bequeathers, under-appreciated and often big men like Duncan, Brand, Bosh, Dirk, Jamison, Kidd, Ray Ray and Redd. These folks give it their all with frightening regularity, churning it out from the opening bell and expected to operate as if to a rhythmic tick. I want to stop short of saying that you can intuit them from looking at a box score, but by and large there is no dramatic arc to their in-game performances. Professional, workmanlike, whatever you want to call them, these are consummate anchors of an offense, the given you pencil in at most moments during the season’s onslaught. <br /><br /><a href="http://static.flickr.com/54/109968528_2b1f794def_o.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px;" src="http://static.flickr.com/54/109968528_2b1f794def_o.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />In the next category, you find explosive players with a tendency toward predictable outcomes, who ebb and flow over the course of a game, occasionally make you doubt, and ultimately bring you right back to who you always knew they were. I’m talking about Garnett, Pierce, Wade, Vince, Billups, Bibby, Gasol, Melo, Richardson, Jefferson, Sheed, Marion, and Artest himself—unquestioned experts who sometimes lull, sometimes soar, but never have to redeem themselves and are constantly working within their own limits and images. This isn’t a knock on any of these fine, hurling turtles; merely to point out that if you turn on the television to see them play, you know what you’re getting and will be accordingly excited. Each game reinforces their , with ups and downs that end in a pointed reminder of yeah, that’s him. <br /><br />Gilbert and his gang, as I will now aptly dub them, rest upon their own set of shaggy shoulders. To return to last week’s trope of half-assed existentialism, All-American and yet bleakly Continental, they are players constantly exceeding themselves, or at least engaging in what feels for all the world like a motherfucking statement game. It can LeBron or Amare exerting and expanding their dominance, Kirilenko or Gerald Wallace twisting up the parameters of a box score, Nash working his conductor-ly magic, or Kobe, Iverson or McGrady scoring not only at will, but as if it’s unnatural for them to miss—or even repeat themselves out on the floor. Arenas is a must-see, not only because he’s likely to put on a show, but for what each and every game can do to your sense of him as a player and personality. If Wade proves with each big game that he’s still Wade, still proud, then Gilbert does it up in a way that’s not only unpredictable; with each of these self-transcending events, he also manages to seem unlikely all anew. As does Kobe, Bron, et al. In the crucible of the game, their legend is broken down and created anew, surprising you not only with this most recent installment but, in its reconstitution of the player’s most basic essence, shock you yet again they exist at all, that anything they do has ever happened in the glare of man’s senses. <br /><br /><img src="http://static.flickr.com/42/109968527_d2dc3991ba.jpg"><br /><br />This may seem like two-bit metaphysics for those of you not in tune with my lifelong education on this planet (or anyone merely taking issue with my late night sloppiness). But next time you find yourself up past bedtime watching one of these aforementioned idols, think about whether or not you feel you’re seeing them for the first time, whether you’re transfixed partly out of the fear that you’re witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence. Not just a good game from your favorite NBA player, or one of those “instant classics” this blog will reference two years from now; I mean one of those performances where, in some ways, you feel like you’re discovering the sport again for the very first time. <br /><br /><a href="http://static.flickr.com/44/109968529_e566e71d16_o.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px;" src="http://static.flickr.com/44/109968529_e566e71d16_o.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nothing-fits-forever.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nothing-fits-forever.php</guid>
<category>Chauncey Billups</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:49:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Center of Attention</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p class="MsoNormal">Thought I’d throw up a special weekend column, since I’m not sure I’ll have one for tomorrow since it’s a holiday and all. Before we get into the situations to pay attention to, I thought we should check in on some of the centers who recently won starting jobs and were popular pick ups over the past couple weeks. I expressed skepticism about all of them for various reasons, and for the most part it looks like it was pretty well-founded. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Francisco Elson</span>: 7.8/6.7/0.6, 0.7 steals, 1.1 blocks, 55% (31-of-56), 28.9 mpg in 9 starts</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Ike Diogu</span>: 9.4/4.5/0.9, 0.1 steals, 0.6 blocks, 62% (28-of-45), 24.1 mpg in 8 starts</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Eddie Griffin</span>: 6.6/6.0/0.7, 0.4 steals, 2.6 blocks, 0.3 3s, 43% (24-of-56), 22.4 mpg in 9 starts</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I know that centers are tough to come by in deep, two-center leagues, but there’s still just not a lot of value up there. Elson is the only one getting acceptable minutes, but even his 29 per game might be considered a disappointment considering that not just <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Marcus Camby</span>, but also <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Kenyon Martin</span>, has been out for the majority of those nine games. He’s doing about what I expected him to do – basically a <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Rasho Nesterovic</span> impersonation – and while he’s not been an embarrassment, those who were hoping for 12 and 8 with close to 2 blocks per game just had unreasonable expectations. Diogu has proven to be a stud in FG%, but if he can’t be on the court enough to take even 6 shots per game, he won’t be able to help you all that much. He’s nowhere close to an asset in any other category. As for Griffin, have more typestrokes been unnecessarily wasted on a single player? </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Three Situations to Pay Attention To</span>
</u>
<br>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Los Angeles Lakers</span>
<br>After just writing about how much space has been wasted writing about Eddie Griffin, it seems pretty silly to follow that up by writing about <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Kwame Brown</span>. As much as we want to call Griffin a disappointment and a tease, it doesn’t even begin to compare to Kwame. But there seems to be a recent shift in Kwame’s game and might be making him a more reliable – if one-dimensional – fantasy option. In his fifth season in the league, Kwame has shown an extremely limited offensive game. His touch around the basket hasn’t developed at all, and while his jumper looks decent at times, he’s never been able to hit it with any consistency. Phil Jackson seems to have realized that – and maybe Kwame has as well – and isn’t asking Kwame to score. Last night’s 18-point “breakout” game was the first time since Nov. 14 that Kwame attempted 10 shots in a game. He’s been recast as someone who’s main duty is to attack the boards, especially on the offensive end. Brown averaged 1.9 offensive boards per game in November, 2.5 per game in December, and is up to 3.3 per game so far in January. The fact that many of his shots are coming off these offensive rebounds is helping his FG%. In six games since re-entering the starting lineup, he’s shooting 54%. Here’s his overall line in those six starts:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">8.8/8.2/1.0, 0 steals, 0.5 blocks, 54% (21-of-39)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It’s pretty comparable to most of those “hot” pickups listed above, but without that secondary category to help out in. Although Brown has no steals in those six games, that’s the one category he’s most likely to offer some help in. He averaged nearly a steal per game while seeing 30 mpg in 03-04, which is pretty decent for a big man. If he remains in the starting lineup he could average somewhere around 0.8 steals and blocks per game, which isn’t spectacular, but isn’t terrible. Expecting any consistency from Kwame is probably pretty foolish at this point. A game like last night’s is still the exception, not the rule. But if he can keep pounding the boards and converting some of those putbacks, he might be able to emerge as something better than just another <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Reggie Evans</span>. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Indiana Pacers</span>
<br>Let’s take a look at <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Jeff Foster</span>’s line so far in January:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">7.3/9.4/0, 0.4 steals, 0.4 blocks, 61% (22-of-36)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Again, not too different from the lines of those Elson/Diogu/Griffin group. Foster is quite similar – and the exact opposite – of Kwame Brown. Like Brown, he seems to be a one-category helper who is pretty consistent in that one category, but doesn’t have much of a shot of helping out elsewhere. Unlike Kwame, Foster seems to be getting the most out of his talent while Brown is getting only a portion. Foster’s upside is extremely limited – he will not score, he will not get blocks. But if you want a boost in rebounds – and only rebounds – he is probably one of the best guys you can grab. I’m not at all a fan of one category specialists because they leave you with holes in too many other categories, but situations get dicey sometimes, especially at center. I thought I was in the perfect situation earlier this year with <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Yao Ming</span> and <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Rasheed Wallace</span>, with a very capable backup on the bench in <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Brendan Haywood</span>. Then Yao went down and Haywood became completely ineffective right around the same time. I ended up dumping Haywood, because he just wasn’t worth using. Since I’m in a daily changes, cumulative roto league, I decided to simply take the beating at center and go way under my projected games limit rather than try my luck with the dregs available on the waiver wire. My strategy is to use quality games when you have them. Right now I have a lot of point guards playing well, so I’ll go over the projected pace there and make a trade from there at a later date, even if it means not getting the best return. But in weekly H2H leagues, this strategy doesn’t work. So guys like Foster might be the best option available. And if you’re strong in blocks thanks to non-centers like <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Andrei Kirilenko</span>, <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Shawn Marion</span> or <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Paul Gasol</span>, Foster can at least give you the boards you need from a center. He’s averaging 9.9 rpg in his last seven contests, and that’s in just 24.4 mpg. With <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Jermaine O’Neal</span> iffy, he might see even more time. Foster’s no savior, but at least you know what you’ll be getting.<span style="font-size:+0;"> </span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Dallas Mavericks</span>
<br>Did someone in your league pick up <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">DeSagana Diop</span> yesterday? It happened in my league, and I’ll admit I was about to make the move myself and was beaten to the punch by about five minutes. I’m not going to lose too much sleep over it, but man, I sure could have used that help in blocks. There’s no denying that Diop is a blocks machine – he’s second in the league blocks per minute, averaging 2.0 bpg in just over 17 minutes, which is rather ridiculous. But the big question is this – even with his ascent to the starting lineup, how much more playing time will Diop actually receive? In last night’s game he saw just 20 minutes, although it’s hard to read too much into that since the game was over early and <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Adrian Griffin</span> was the only player in the game to play more than 30 minutes. One of the many problems with Diop early in his career was his total lack of conditioning, and while he’s gotten better, it’s hard for someone to start consistently playing more than he ever has and to do it at a high level. This is Diop’s fifth season in the league and he’s played more than 30 minutes in a game a grand total of <i>two</i> times. This is one of the same arguments I made against <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Al Jefferson</span> even after he joined the starting lineup and he hasn’t broken the 30-minute mark at all in 8 starts. Avery Johnson hasn’t given up on <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Erick Dampier</span> yet, and this could be one of those old-fashioned “motivation” benchings, although it might take more than that to motivate a guy who’s going to get paid $53 million over the next five seasons no matter what. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Some people want to think of Diop as a poor man’s <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Ben Wallace</span>, but a homeless, penniless Ben Wallace might be more like it. Like Wallace, Diop can help out in steals; he averages 1.3 steals per 40 over his career, which isn’t bad at all for a center. Unfortunately, he also shares Big Ben’s inability to put the ball in the basket. While he’s shooting 45% this season, he’s a career 37% shooter. And it would be a miracle if he could ever get his FT% up to 50%. While he won’t shoot nearly enough in either category to hurt you too much, it’s still worth noting. The Mavs are an extremely deep team. They don’t need to have a center out there at all times, as they can get by with <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Dirk Nowitzki</span> at the five for stretches. The Mavs need Diop to be at his most energetic whenever he’s out there, so it’s probably not in their best interests to have him out there for 32-35 mpg. Grab him, stash him, start him if you need him, but if there’s one lesson that his column should make you realize, it’s that finding serious help at center on the waiver wire is almost always more fantasy than reality. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">
<u>Comet Gain</u>
</span>
<br>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Chris Kaman</span> – Wow. Just, wow. Not only a top center, but a dominant overall force the past couple weeks. Might not last when <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Elton Brand</span> returns, but he’s looking more and more like a legit #1 center.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Samuel Dalembert</span> – Like Kaman, not just a top center lately, but an absolutely dominant force. He’s not missing – including from the line – and he’s swatting away everything in sight (which unfortunately for the 76ers means many obvious goaltends). His 37 mpg so far in January is huge for a center.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Ben Wallace</span> – The old Big Ben is back; 13.8 boards and 2.7 blocks so far in January. Now about that 29% from the free throw line in that span…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Hold Steady</span>
</u>
<br>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Rasheed Wallace</span> – Has slowed down a bit, his rebounding leaves a lot to be desired from a C, but he’ll keep raining in those 3s and getting the blocks.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Zydrunas Ilgauskas</span> – He’s staying healthy, he’s hitting his shots, and is more than respectable on the boards and in blocks. A steadying force in the middle.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Brad Miller</span> – A couple of down games recently, but he’s still one of the top 30 or so fantasy players in the league.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Fall</span>
</u>
<br>
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Shaquille O’Neal</span> – You knew you were punting free throws; but 15/10 with just 1 block per game in January leaves a lot to be desired.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Brendan Haywood</span> – Back in the starting lineup after a two-game absence, but still too inconsistent to be counted on.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Joel Przybilla</span> – Nothing more than a blocks specialist now that <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Theo Ratliff</span> is on a run of good health. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’ll do my very best to answer any relevant big man questions in the comments here, so feel free to ask away on guys not mentioned (or mentioned) here. </p>
</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/center-of-attention.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/center-of-attention.php</guid>
<category>Shawn Marion</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:41:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kirilenko stays on the block</title>
<description>    Utah Jazz forward Andrei Kirilenko who last season became the first non-center to lead the NBA in blocked shots per game is trying for a repeat. Kirilenko 6-9 was No. 2 going into Tuesday&apos;s games despite missing 10 contests because of injuries. He has blocked at least one shot in each of the 25 games he has played and has four or more in nine games. He had a season-high eight blocks against Portland on Dec. 14. Kirilenko talked with USA TODAY NBA reporter Roscoe Nance about the art of blocking shots.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-stays-on-the-block.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-stays-on-the-block.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:05:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kirilenko out with back spasms</title>
<description><![CDATA[    Back trouble sidelines Jazz forward<br /><br /> by Associated Press<br /><br />CLEVELAND -- Utah Jazz forward Andrei Kirilenko sat out
Tuesday night's game against the Cleveland Cavaliers because of
back spasms.<br /><br /><br /><br />
	   Kirilenko, who missed seven games last month with a sprained
right ankle, had to leave Saturday's game in...
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-out-with-back-spasms.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-out-with-back-spasms.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:06:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Please Mr. Postman</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">As promised, today we’ll open up the mailbag to see what you all are talking about …<br>
<br>
<strong>Q: </strong>Hey guys, got a question today regarding the SG position on my team.   I'm down to James Posey, who I was going to get rid of after this week.  I have a few guys in the FA pool I hope you guys can rank for me.This is a 12 team, H2H league, 12 catagories, FGM, FTM, 3Pt%, and TOs are all counted. These are the guys I think are worth a shot.  Sarunas Jasikevicius, Smush Parker, David Wesley, JR Smith, Desmond Mason, Kareem Rush, Devin HarrisThanksMin<br>
<br>
<strong>A: </strong>Well, you’ve got a pretty healthy list of people there on your waiver wire for a 12-team league.  First, let’s trim the fat: <strong>Kareem Rush</strong>, <strong>Devin Harris</strong>, and <strong>David Wesley </strong>are all nice players to be sure, but none of them are going to really be effective from a fantasy standpoint right now.  That could change with injuries (particularly for Harris, should <strong>Jason Terry</strong> get injured), but they are a clear step down from the rest of the class.<br>
<br>Of the rest, it really depends on what you need.  <strong>Parker</strong>, <strong>Jasikevicius </strong>and <strong>Smith </strong>(I’m assuming you mean the NOK one) are all very similar players whose value really lies in their three pointers.  Should <strong>Jamaal Tinsley </strong>get hurt for an extended period (which he usually does), Jasikevicius could have the most value of the three, but as it is I like JR Smith the best right now.<br>
<br>That said, <strong>Desmond Mason </strong>– if he’s still available – should be the guy to target.  It’s taken him a while to break into the rotation but now that he’s there, he’ll start to put up similar numbers to last year in Milwaukee, with about 17 points and 4-5 boards.  He’ll definitely end up being the most consistent of those guys – don’t let the rough start to the season fool you.<br>
<br>
<br>
<strong>Q: </strong>Hey guys,<br>What to do with <strong>Kirilenko</strong>?  Tons of owners are trying to buy low in him but I've stayed strong.  Wait until a breakout game then sell high?  What should I expect in return?<br>
<br>Thanks guys,<br>Charlie<br>
<br>
<strong>A: </strong>Well, DM talked to this yesterday in the comments section, but I’ve got to say I’m a little concerned about <strong>AK47</strong>.  Sure, right now, he’s coming back from injury, but if you look at how he’s performed after his stellar 2003 season, the numbers aren’t very encouraging.  Last year, he saw drops in boards, points and steals, and the trends are continuing this year.  He’s also shooting from beyond the arc less often and less accurately.  Sure the blocks are as strong as ever, but what makes Kirilenko so great from a fantasy standpoint is his statistical versatility.  That seems to be on the way down.<br>
<br>Another concern has to be the injuries.  Now, all of the injuries he’s suffered have been one-time deals.  Ankles and wrists are much less scary than knees and backs.  But at some point, one-time deals turn into trends.  Maybe he’s just a reckless player – lots of times you’ve gotta sacrifice your body to get the steals and blocks that he does.  Right now, if you can sell him at a second-round value, I think you should do it.  But if you can buy him for a third- or fourth-round value, I think that’s worth considering as well.<br>
<br>
<br>
<strong>Q:  </strong>Hey, what’s up with <strong>Rasheed Wallace</strong>?  He’s way over his career averages in “little guy” categories: 3s, assists, steals, and FT%.  And he’s well below his averages in typical center cats like rebounds, points, and FG%.  All in all, of course, he’s playing much better than last year for roto purposes.  Is his performance so far a fluke, or part of the new coaching style in Detroit?  Is it time to trade him?  <br>
<br>
<strong>A:  </strong>What’s up with <strong>Sheed</strong>?  How about, what’s up with the Pistons?  A team that’s scored 91.4, 90.1 and 93.3 points in ’02 – ’04 is racking up 98.9 ppg this year under new coach <strong>Flip Saunders</strong>, good for 7th in the league.  They’re also passing the ball much better than in the past, with 23.9 apg, second only to the Suns, and much higher than the 21.8 apg they had last year.<br>
<br>Sheed is the second-biggest benefactor in the new offense behind <strong>Chauncey Billups</strong>, and while I think his value this year will be higher than it was in the past, you’ve got to assume that those steals will come down to around 1 per game, and that eventually his 3PT% will drop back to his career level and he’ll land around 1.5 3’s per game.  If that sounds good to your team – I’d say keep him.  You likely won’t get the value you deserve for a player like Sheed who does so many of the “little guy” things, like you said.<br>
<br>
<br>
<strong>Q: </strong>Assuming <strong>Darius Miles </strong>is out with season ending injury (cartilage damage), who is to be picked up?  <strong>Pryzbilla </strong>and <strong>Zach </strong>are already picked up, but what do you think about the fantasy values of telfair, dixon, and patterson?  (or even webster)Thanks, Patrick<br>
<br>
<strong>A: </strong>Great question.  Let’s go through the list (and we’ll even add one).<br>
<br>
<strong>Telfair: </strong>He should already be on a roster in your league, but if not, go grab him.  This injury means he’ll be scoring more and that means he moves from marginal value to a decent utility player.<br>
<br>
<strong>Dixon:  </strong>No one is dearer to our hearts than Dixon (we’re both UMD grads), but as a fantasy player, he needs to consistently play 35 mpg to really have value because he can be so inconsistent with his shot.  And he’s not going to get 35 mpg.<br>
<br>
<strong>Patterson: </strong>Here’s my pick for the biggest benefactor.  It’s no secret that Patterson and the Blazers don’t get along.  With Miles out, now Portland can play Patterson plenty to boost his trade value.  Last night was a great example, as he played 28 minutes and put up 19 points.  Not a bad performance.  He’s worth picking up if you’ve got an extra bench spot.<br>
<br>
<strong>Webster:  </strong>If you like JR Smith (The NOK version), you’ll love Martell Webster.  It’s just too soon for this guy right now.<br>
<br>
<strong>Travis Outlaw: </strong>Here’s the guy that we’d love to see get the minutes.  His combination of steals and blocks are quite a fantasy commodity – only about 10 players average over 1 steal and 1 block per game.  Given 25-30 mpg, he could be one of these players.  Unfortunately, I just don’t see him getting the time while they’re showcasing Patterson.<br>
<br>And if you want to know what DM thinks, here’s what he has to say: “The clearest benefactor of miles' injury is <strong>Ha Seung Jin</strong>, who should put up a consistent 12/8 with 2 blocks.”  Of course, he’s kidding.<br>
<br>Thanks everyone for the great questions!</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/please-mr-postman.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/please-mr-postman.php</guid>
<category>Chauncey Billups</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:53:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Patterson skies for a follow jam</title>
<description>    Ruben Patterson&apos;s huge follow dunk on Andrei Kirilenko and the Jazz.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/patterson-skies-for-a-follow-jam.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/patterson-skies-for-a-follow-jam.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:18:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Camby</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">In yesterday’s column, in which I ranked the top 20 fantasy players right now, I was able to hold off on the number one fantasy player thus far until 15, at which point I took a deep breath, winced a bit, and typed the name “<strong>Marcus Camby</strong>” into the column.<br>
<br>It’s not like I was actually drafting him, or trading for him, or that I really had put any stock into the guy whatsoever, but still, it was a tough decision to make.  You can’t ignore the stats, but you also can’t ignore these numbers: 63, 63, 46, 59, 63, 29, 29.  Those are Camby’s games played in the first 7 years of his career, and they were enough to label him fantasy death.<br>
<br>But then in ’03-04, a breakthrough – Camby stayed upright for a career-high 72 games, and then last year put up a respectable 66.  His combined 138 games the last 2 years are better than <strong>Tim Duncan</strong>, <strong>Kobe Bryant</strong>, <strong>Andrei Kirilenko</strong>, and <strong>Allen Iverson </strong>- and all of those guys are perennial first or early second round picks.<br>
<br>So how long must Camby play a bunch of games before fantasy players give him some respect?  Well, he’s certainly put a wrench in our wait-another-year-or-two-and-then-give-in strategy, as he’s erupted for 16 and 14 with 3.7 blocks, 1.4 steals, and 56% shooting.  All of a sudden, the critical time for Camby is right now.  Buy or sell?  Let’s examine:<br>
<br>First things first: there is no way Camby will continue to put up these massive numbers.  Eventually he’ll slip down to something like 14/11 with 2.8-3 blocks and shooting just under 50%.  Still, those are fantasy stud numbers, especially from a center.  And a player like that is worth way more than the 40th pick where Camby was drafted on average.  Now, granted, I don’t think his value is really in the mid-teens.  But to say that he’s an early-20’s type player isn’t much of a stretch.  With <strong>Nene </strong>out for the year, and <strong>K-Mart </strong>hurting, he’ll continue to play a major role for the Nuggets over the rest of the season – as long as he stays healthy.<br>
<br>That’s where the guessing game comes in.  How many games can he really be expected to play this year?  Well as DM said yesterday, I'm not a doctor - and I don't even play one on the Internet.  But there are examples of oft-injured guys who recover to be reliable.  Zydraunas Ilgauskas may be the best example, as he played just 29 games over two years early in his career, then rebounded with 66 games in ’01-’02, and has missed no more than 3 games in any of the last three years.  So it’s not unprecedented for an oft-injured guy to come through with a reliable couple of years.<br>
<br>I’m not going to venture a guess on how many games Camby will play, but I will say this.  Fantasy sports are all about gambling.  At the end of the year, the winner of your fantasy league at some point made a decision to take a chance and that chance came through.  Marcus Camby, right now, is one of those chances.  If your team is struggling right now, and you need to take a chance if you want any hope of making it to the top of the standings, going after Camby is a decent idea.  Even if your team is doing well, getting Camby at a discount could end up winning your league.<br>
<br>What’s fair value?  Well, DM and I agree that Camby right now is a top-30 value, taking the injury risk into account.  The more games he plays, though, the higher that value gets, so the time to strike is now.  So if you’ve got Camby, and don’t want the risk anymore, only deal him if you can get a top-30 guy for him.  If you want to try and add Camby to your team, and you can do it for less that that, than by all means pull the trigger.<br>
<br>It’s pretty rare that a guy can have such a critical year for his fantasy value at age 31, but that’s the situation Camby is in.  If you want to ride the wave, you’d better get on quick – but we won’t blame you for staying on the sideline.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/on-camby.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/on-camby.php</guid>
<category>Utah Jazz</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:05:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New! Updated! Top 20!</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Every couple of weeks here at FBB, we update our rankings of the elitest of the elite.  Basically, we’re treating this like a new mock draft.  If your draft was held today, how would it look?  This is our best guess.<br>
<br>1. <strong>Kevin Garnett</strong>, SF, Min<br>Sure the free throws are a concern, but there is a reason this guy went #1 in many drafts – consistency.  He’ll come around.<br>
<br>2. <strong>Dirk Nowitzki</strong>, PF, Dal<br>You can yell all you want, but right now I’d take Dirk over LeBron.  A plus in every single category except assists.<br>
<br>3. <strong>LeBron James</strong>, SF, Cle<br>Boards, blocks and steals are all half of what they were last year.  Junior slump?  He’ll break out of it, but still.<br>
<br>4. <strong>Shawn Marion</strong>, F, Pho<br>No <strong>Amare </strong>means the Matrix is an inside presence on offense – that means more boards, but less (as in ZERO) three pointers made so far this year.<br>
<br>5. <strong>Tim Duncan</strong>, F/C, SA<br>That 85% from the stripe will come down, but if it stays over 75%, he returns to elite status.<br>
<br>6. <strong>Tracy McGrady</strong>, G/F, Hou<br>If there are two things that don’t go away, it’s knee problems and back problems.  T-Mac has both.  You’ve gotta worry about that.<br>
<br>7. <strong>Kobe Bryant</strong>, SG, LAL<br>He’s scoring 2 more ppg this year, but it’s taking him 6 more shots because of the lack of threes and the fact that he’s not getting to the line as much as in the past.  Steals and assists are also down, but those should come.<br>
<br>8. <strong>Dwyane Wade</strong>, G, Mia<br>With Shaq out, he’s been carrying the load.  His stats remind me of Lebron last year, minus the threes.<br>
<br>9. <strong>Gilbert Arenas</strong>, PG, Was<br>FBB’s hometown hero is making us proud. He won’t shoot anywhere near 50% this year, but if he can stay over 43%, he’s a top-ten pick next year.<br>
<br>10. <strong>Allen Iverson</strong>, G, Phi<br>Last year was no fluke.  AI as a PG is the real deal.<br>
<br>11. <strong>Paul Pierce</strong>, G/F, Bos<br>Off to a hot start – his 8 boards, 26.3 points, and 48% from the field all would be career highs.  All will come down eventually, but not by much.<br>
<br>12. <strong>Steve Nash</strong>, PG, Pho<br>Has yet to miss from the stripe.  Still, how long can he keep this up, with no Amare?<br>
<br>13. <strong>Elton Brand</strong>, PF, LAC<br>61% from the field?  That will have to come down eventually, but the uptick in blocks is encouraging.<br>
<br>14. <strong> Jason Kidd</strong>, PG, NJN<br>If you can overlook the lack of points and FG%, he’s a top fantasy PG.<br>
<br>15. <strong>Marcus Camby</strong>, C, Den<br>Ok, we can’t let him slide any further.  This guys deserves his own column – maybe we’ll get to him this week.<br>
<br>16. <strong>Ray Allen</strong>, SG, Sea<br>The steals are a nice surprise, and the rest is classic RayRay.<br>
<br>17. <strong>Peja Stojakovic</strong>, SF, Sac<br>He’s baaaaaack.  The Kings may be struggling, but it’s not Peja’s fault – his 3.3 threes and 97% from the stripe are flat out awesome.<br>
<br>18. <strong>Vince Carter</strong>, G/F, NJN<br>If you thought he’d maintain that 27 ppg from last year, you were crazy, but he’s turning in a very nice year so far.<br>
<br>19. <strong>Andrei Kirilenko</strong>, F, Utah<br>A total lack of shooting (from the field, the stripe, and the arc) combined with an ankle injury means AK-47 is our biggest slipper so far.<br>
<br>20.  <strong>Richard Jefferson</strong>, F, NJN<br>There’s a lot to like about Jefferson right now, but our favorite numbers are the 9 boards and 4.6 assists.  A higher-scoring <strong>Lamar Odom</strong>, sorta.<br>
<br>Just missing the cut:<br>
<strong>Yao Ming</strong>, <strong>Chauncey Billups</strong>, <strong>Eddie Jones</strong>, Lamar Odom, <strong>Antawn Jamison</strong>, <strong>Michael Redd</strong>.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/new-updated-top-20.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/new-updated-top-20.php</guid>
<category>Utah Jazz</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:38:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Okur&apos;s huge night can&apos;t lift Jazz to win</title>
<description>    Luol Deng scored 21 points and Kirk Hinrich added 19 points and 11 assists to lead the Chicago Bulls over the Utah Jazz 103-98 Saturday night

Mehmet Okur had a career-high 33 points and 17 rebounds for Utah, which played most of the game without Andrei Kirilenko after he injured his left ankle early in the second quarter.

Ben Gordon scored 17 points and Andres Nocioni added 15 for Chicago.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/okurs-huge-night-cant-lift-jazz-to-win.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/okurs-huge-night-cant-lift-jazz-to-win.php</guid>
<category>Chicago Bulls</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:20:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kirilenko sprains ankle vs. Bulls</title>
<description>    Utah Jazz forward Andrei Kirilenko left Saturday night&apos;s game against the Chicago Bulls early in the second quarter after he sprained his left ankle.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-sprains-ankle-vs-bulls.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-sprains-ankle-vs-bulls.php</guid>
<category>Chicago Bulls</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Errant shots a problem for Jazz</title>
<description>    They say the first step is admitting you have a problem. So Andrei Kirilenko is already that much closer to a cure.   He won&apos;t come right out and say I&apos;m Andrei Kirilenko and I&apos;m a shot-aholic. But slowly quietly the Russian forward is trying he says to address his serial-shooting tendencies. Shots aren&apos;t bad he insists and taking lots of shots doesn&apos;t make him an evil person.   But I don&apos;t help team by missing the fifth-year forward concedes. I&apos;m not trying to miss. . . . The answer is I have to miss less. 
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/errant-shots-a-problem-for-jazz.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/errant-shots-a-problem-for-jazz.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Truth Is Out, Part 2</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">So BV did his draft recap and now it’s my turn. Like he said, we start 10 players (PG, SG, G, SF, PF, F, C, C, UT, UT), with three bench spots, 12 teams. So it’s a pretty deep league, and it’s very competitive. Hard to slip sleepers past these guys. Guys like Zaza Pachulia, Marquis Daniels, Eddie Griffin, Mike James, etc. were all gone by the 9th round, for example. My strategy going in was to heed my rankings, take the best player available with most picks, not get too hung up on positions, and not to ignore percentages, which always seem to give me problems. Let’s see how I did.<br>
<br>1st Round (4th overall): <strong>Dirk Nowitzki</strong>, PF<br>I was hoping that Marion would fall to me, but he went #3. It’s hard to complain about Dirk, and if continues to trade in a few 3s for a few more blocks, I’ll take it. He’s 27, clearly in his prime, clearly the top option on a perennially high scoring team, and he set career highs in blocks, assists and points last year. I’m banking on a repeat. I was tempted to take <strong>Kobe</strong>, and even a little tempted to shock the world and take <strong>Kirilenko</strong>, but in the end Dirk was the obvious choice.<br>
<br>2nd Round (21st overall): <strong>Yao Ming</strong>, C<br>I told my dad the day before that draft that if Yao was there for me at 21 I would take him, and I stuck to my word. Even in his “disappointing” season last year he finished 17th on the player rater, and he seems bound to take a leap forward this year, if he can continue to improve his game and his minutes per game by 3 or 4, which is a distinct possibility. I certainly liked him more than <strong>Jermaine O’Neal</strong>, and I was thought about <strong>Vinsanity</strong> and <strong>Mike Bibby</strong>, but a dominant center in the second round without reaching was too good to pass up.<br>
<br>3rd Round (28th overall): <strong>Pau Gasol</strong>, PF<br>I deliberated a whole lot here. Gasol was the highest person left on my board, but I’ve drafted him the past two years and have been burned before, by a frustrating rotation and injuries. And did I really want to go with three big men with my first three picks, after I preach about PGs so much? In the end I decided to trust myself and go with Gasol. All three players so far are big men with very solid percentages and Gasol, like Ming, seems likely to increase his effectiveness and playing time as he enters his prime and will be the featured player on a thinned-out Memphis squad. His foot problems are a concern, but I went with him over <strong>Bosh</strong>, <strong>Joe Johnson</strong> and <strong>Rashard Lewis</strong>.<br>
<br>4th Round (45th overall): <strong>Kirk Hinrich</strong>, G<br>I was absolutely thrilled to get Captain Kirk near the end of the fourth round. He was my highest ranked player left and I desperately needed a top flight PG. The next four picks – <strong>Boozer</strong>, <strong>Camby</strong>, <strong>Redd</strong>, <strong>Parker</strong> – show what a drop-off there was. Kirk’s FG% is rather brutal, but I’m hoping those first three guys could help offset it.<br>
<br>5th Round (52nd overall): <strong>Cuttino Mobley</strong>, SG<br>The middle rounds are always the toughest, and my strategy was to not give in to hype and to instead draft players who I felt would be sure-thing, solid contributors all season. Mobley may have been a bit of a reach, but he has a history of playing 40 mpg and he could very well see that on a thin Clippers team. And you know he’ll be launching his share of 3s, as well. I was strongly considering Lamar Odom, but figured I had plenty of boards and could use a gunner.<br>
<br>6th Round (69th overall): <strong>Rasheed Wallace</strong>, FC<br>Another steady, unspectacular pick. Rasheed has a solid all-around game and the fact that he qualifies at center means that I don’t have to worry about depending on one of those “who the hell knows?” guys that ended up going in the next few rounds. His percentages are rather weak, and he might have some clashes with Flip Saunders, but his track record shows steady production and good health. I might very well regret not going with <strong>Rafer Alston</strong> or <strong>Donyell Marhsall</strong> at this spot.<br>
<br>7th Round (76th overall): <strong>Richard Hamilton</strong>, SG<br>The ultimate safe pick. I’m not a huge fan of Rip’s fantasy game, but in the 7th round it’s hard to argue. I often overlook points, and Rip is always a nice source. He’s another great free throw shooter, and even if he doesn’t match his 5 apg of last year, he should be a solid contributor (see a theme developing?) there. He’s another person who you can leave in the lineup and not worry about, and I think my first seven picks, while lacking in flashiness are extremely solid.<br>
<br>8th Round (93rd overall): <strong>Mark Jaric</strong>, G<br>Here’s where you can start going for riskier picks. Or, at least that’s what I’m saying in retrospect. I don’t love this pick, at all. I’m a huge fan of Jaric’s potential, but he’s always hurt and depending on him as my #2 PG has disaster written all over it. If he stays healthy, I’m rather confident this pick will be a steal, but that’s very iffy. His high assist rate might also drop since Minnesota runs its offense through <strong>KG</strong>.<br>
<br>9th Round (100th overall): <strong>Josh Childress</strong>, GF<br>On the other hand, I was thrilled to land Childress in the 9th round. He was actually the only player that I’ve hyped up this season that ended up on my team. He was almost a top 50 player in the second half of last season, and can help in just about every category. <strong>Tayshaun Prince</strong> went three rounds earlier and I think Childress will end up with the better numbers at the end of the year.<br>
<br>10th Round (117th overall): <strong>Eddie Jones</strong>, GF<br>BV hates this pick, but I stand by it. If he was able to finish 52nd on the rater last season when he averaged nearly five points less than he had the past few seasons, he looks to have a slight resurgence in Memphis where he will be looked to as one of the main options behind Gasol. He had a horrid preseason, but this is one of those cases where I’ll take the 10 years of stats over the few preseason games. If he turns out to be a total bust, it’s only a 10th rounder.<br>
<br>11th Round (124th overall): <strong>Brendan Haywood</strong>, C<br>OK, this was a pure homer pick, I admit. Brendan is my girlfriend’s favorite player and I figured by having him on my team, I just bought myself a good 40-50 extra hours of basketball watching this season, at least. And for a third center, he’s not so bad, and it’s always nice to have a player on your favorite team to root for. It was the 11th round – <strong>Juan Dixon</strong>, <strong>Lorenzen Wright</strong> and <strong>Charlie Villanueva</strong> were the next three picks – I feel fine about this. That said, it came down to him and <strong>Mike Dunleavy</strong> and if I wasn’t a Maryland grad who was a Wizards fan, we know who I would have picked. I hope this one doesn’t haunt me.<br>
<br>12th Round (141st overall): <strong>T.J. Ford</strong>, PG<br>This one really upset BV, who cried shenanigans since I have not spoken well of Ford at all here on FBB. But hey, player value is all relative – in the 12th round, with Hinrich and Jaric as my only two PGs, I feel this is a strong pick. I still think <strong>Mo Williams</strong> is just as good of a player, at least this season, and Ford is a major injury risk, but I needed the depth.<br>
<br>13th Round (148th overall): <strong>Mike Sweetney</strong>, PF<br>With my last pick I decided to go with someone with some decent upside but also someone I wouldn’t mind jettisoning early on. Each year the waiver wire offers a few players who emerge in the first few weeks of the season that turn out to be quite valuable and you have to be ready to pounce on them. With news that Sweetney will be coming off the bench initially, and knowing that Scott Skiles can be downright Sloan/Hubie Brown-ish when it comes to rotations, Sweetney might be packing his bags soon.<br>
<br>So there’s my team. I think that it’s pretty (here comes that word) solid top to bottom. My top four picks are all young and in their primes, and the rest of my squad is a good mix of established vets and young, but not necessarily green, players. I don’t have any one-category studs and instead am relying on a group effort to put me at the top of most categories. I’m admittedly thin at point guard, but you know that I’m always ready to rotate through the flavor of the week at that position.<br>
<br>Thoughts on who has the better squad, myself of BV???<br>
<br>Enjoy the first games of the season tonight. Go Dirk!</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/the-truth-is-out-part-2.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/the-truth-is-out-part-2.php</guid>
<category>Joe Johnson</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:39:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kirilenko still struggling</title>
<description>    The mask he has been wearing is designed to shield his broken nose. Jessica Kourkounis, Associated Press Houston&apos;s Yao Ming, right, tries to defend Utah point guard Keith McLeod on Wednesday in Houston.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-still-struggling.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-still-struggling.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:16:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kirilenko in form for Jazz</title>
<description>    Andre Kirilenko scored 19 points and Mehmet Okur had 11 points and 10 rebounds to lead the Utah Jazz to a 92-73 victory over the Portland Trail Blazers in a preseason game at the University of Oregon on Thursday night.Rookie Deron Williams the No. 3 overall pick in the NBA draft came off the bench to score 12 points for the Jazz while Kris Humphries added 10. 
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-in-form-for-jazz.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/kirilenko-in-form-for-jazz.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:26:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rip Hamilton&apos;s Secret Exposed!</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Along with pondering the idea of painting his clear face mask like a superhero, <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sports/ci_3102765">Andrei Kirilenko talks about how refs probably call tougher games on guys guarding players with broken noses</a>. Rip Hamilton is sooo going to hurt AK47 for giving away his secret.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/rip-hamiltons-secret-exposed.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/rip-hamiltons-secret-exposed.php</guid>
<category>Andrei Kirilenko</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:26:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>