<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>HOOPLOG: Denver Nuggets</title>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/denver-nuggets/index.php</link>
<description>NBA basketball news, rumors, insider analysis and more from around the country.  Updated hourly by Team RxSN.</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 15:03:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>The series we have all been waiting for!!!</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
  <p>What a great first round.&nbsp; We, the humble fans of the NBA, have been given some great contests&nbsp;filled with buzzer beaters and last second heroics.&nbsp; The first round rattled off without much of a&nbsp;hitch as the favored teams have won as expected.&nbsp; The only outcome which remains to be seen would of course be Phoenix and Los Angeles tonight at America West Arena.&nbsp; It will be a shame for one of these teams to have to start&nbsp;planning their fishing trip tonight, as they have both played a great series.&nbsp; With that said, let us look ahead to a matchup that many NBA fans have been looking forward to for months.</p>
  <p><strong><u><font size="4">San Antonio Spurs vs. Dallas Mavericks</font></u></strong></p>
  <p>The much anticipated west semifinal is finally upon us!&nbsp; Avery Johnson and company will make their way to the AT&amp;T Center for the series opener tomorrow at high noon.&nbsp; This matchup promises to be an extremely exciting one.&nbsp; </p>
  <p>Dallas of course comes into the second round after taking out Memphis in four straight.&nbsp; The Spurs, on the other hand, had a little bit more trouble with Sacramento.&nbsp; Given the regular season split of two games a piece this series could very well stretch to seven games.&nbsp; There will be some key factors in this series&nbsp;that play into who is moving on to&nbsp;the next round and who is getting their fishing gear ready.&nbsp; These are a couple of&nbsp;questions that might hold the answer as to who wins the series.</p>
  <p><strong>Who will set the tone in Game 1?&nbsp; </strong></p>
  <p>Unfortunately the Spurs head into game 1 only 36 hours after playing the Kings in Sacramento.&nbsp; Parker's right thigh contusion and other ailments on his right side will definitely be hurting him.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Duncan has looked solid over the the last few games and showed signs that the plantar fascilitis isn't bothering him as much as it had during the regular season.&nbsp; Ginobili also looks to be back close to 100% again.&nbsp; Still, the limited rest has many Spurs fans concerned.&nbsp; The Spurs have played less than .500 basketball on&nbsp;back to backs&nbsp;this year.&nbsp; The Mavs come in with plenty of time off, in fact maybe a&nbsp;little bit too much.&nbsp; They haven't played a game since Monday so&nbsp;the key for&nbsp;Dallas will be how rusty they are and how quickly they can shake that off.&nbsp; However, the pressure lies more squarely on San Antonio being that they must come out and protect their homecourt.&nbsp; The Spurs will have to set the tone by matching Dallas' intensity on both ends of the floor to have a chance of beating the Mavs in game 1.</p>
  <p><strong>Whose bench will step up?</strong></p>
  <p>Both of these teams possess a lot of depth off the bench.&nbsp; No doubt that the edge of the bench play will be pretty even on paper.&nbsp; San Antonio has&nbsp;enjoyed&nbsp;solid production from Finley, Barry, and Horry thus far in the playoffs.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Jerry Stackhouse and Erick Dampier gave Dallas a spark off the bench is the opening round, while Marquis Daniels has the ability to give the Mavs a solid contribution as well.&nbsp; Pop made a change and started Robert Horry in games 5 and 6 of the first round against Sacramento,&nbsp;similar to switching out Ginobili&nbsp;with Brent Barry in the first round last year against Denver.&nbsp; Nazr Mohammed or Rasho Nesterovic will probably slip back into the starting spot for the beginning of this series unless Pop feels that he would rather keep the change with Horry starting and Rasho giving energy off the bench.&nbsp;&nbsp;Regardless, a big key for San Antonio is&nbsp;winning the&nbsp;rebounding battle, meaning&nbsp;Mohammed and Nesterovic&nbsp;will have to give Duncan as much help as possible on the glass inside.</p>
  <p><strong>Who will win the battle of the big men?</strong></p>
  <p>For Dallas on offense Dirk Nowitzki can create mismatch problems for the Spurs.&nbsp; He is not a prototypical seven-footer in that hes not a low post player.&nbsp; Duncan, who is not an excellent perimeter defender, will&nbsp;hurt the&nbsp;Spurs if hes sucked out of the post.&nbsp; Duncan is a dominant rebounding force and he must remain inside to&nbsp;prevent the Mavs from crashing the offensive glass.&nbsp; Its no secret that the team that wins the rebounding battle usually puts themself in a better position to win the game.&nbsp; Pop, who&nbsp;used Bowen at times during the regular season to guard Nowitzki, will probably give him the assignment along with Robert Horry.&nbsp; Keeping Duncan inside will force Nowitzki to take more jump shots and leave the&nbsp;Spurs a dominant rebounder and shot blocker&nbsp;inside.</p>
  <p><strong>Will the student become the teacher?</strong></p>
  <p>Avery Johnson will match wits&nbsp;with his former coach&nbsp;Gregg Popovich for the first time in playoff competition. &nbsp;Johnson&nbsp;knows the Spurs better than any head coach in the league.&nbsp; Using his knowledge to exploit the weaknesses of his former team will be crucial if the Mavs want to win the series.&nbsp; The problem: the&nbsp;Spurs don't&nbsp;have a lot of weaknesses.&nbsp; They are the most well-rounded&nbsp;ball club this&nbsp;side of Detroit.&nbsp; Still, Avery has his guys playing great basketball right now and he will&nbsp;bring&nbsp;the defensive mentality that&nbsp;Pop instilled in him during his playing days in silver and black.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
  <p>Fans should be happy that they get an early preview of the Western Conference Finals.&nbsp; San Antonio and Dallas might be the two best teams in the league.&nbsp; The winner of this series is going to win the West and has a good chance of winning it all.&nbsp; So get ready for some action-packed-hard-nosed-ratings-producing basketball!</p><br><br><a href="http://blogs.foxsports.com/ctodrummer/24156#comments">No comments</a>
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/the-series-we-have-all-been-waiting-for.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/the-series-we-have-all-been-waiting-for.php</guid>
<category>Dirk Nowitzki</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 15:03:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sound of Sam</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <p>We love Sam Cassell, and it's not just because he's unafraid to slip in a &quot;Coming to America&quot; reference while addressing 19,000 people.</p>

<p>The guy's a winner. (A winner who closed his thank-you address to the Staples Center fans before the final regular-season game by saying &quot;Sexual Chocolate!&quot;)</p>

<p>In Cassell's rookie year the Houston Rockets won the first major professional championship in the city's history. The next year, they won the second.</p>

<p>In 2000, Cassell was in Milwaukee when the Bucks went to the conference finals for the first time in 14 years.</p>

<p>In 2004, his first year in Minnesota, the Timberwolves made it out of the first round - and all the way to the conference finals - for the first time in franchise history.</p>

<p>And now he has guided the Clippers to the second round for the first time since the franchise came to California in 1978.</p>

<p>Cassell arrives, sets up shop, and the team gets better. It keeps happening.</p>

<p>&quot;Ain't that something?&quot; Cassell said. </p>

<p>Here's his five-minute explanation, while standing in the middle of the Clipper locker room after the Clips eliminated the Denver Nuggets Monday night.</p>

<p>&quot;One thing about me, I need five guys that's willing to give it up, man. To every night take that court and fight hard. If you do that man, I swear, I can't predict the future, but I can tell you one thing: we're going to win some basketball games. We're going to win more than you won last year.</p>

<p>&quot;People don't realize, when I went to Milwaukee, Ray Allen was a good player. I made him an all-star. I'm not saying I did it all by myself, but I had a big part in him and Glen Robinson becoming all-stars when I was there. I went to Minnesota, Kevin Garnett was not mentioned for the MVP. He was first team, but was he mentioned for MVP candidate? I make him the MVP. He will make me a second-team all-NBA player and an all-star, but I had a whole lot to do - Sprewell and myself - with his development in becoming an MVP. Know what I'm saying?&quot;</p>

<p><em>What does it take to draw it out of these guys?</em></p>

<p>&quot;Push 'em. Push 'em Elton Brand's an example. I said, 'Elton, if you want to be a top 10 power forward, you've got to be able to hit the 15-foot jumper. Everything else you do is cool, you've got to take your jump shot. Because people only play you inside.' Now he took his game out 15 feet, I said, 'You make six jumpers, that's 12 points. You get 10 points inside, 22. Free throws, now you've got 26.' It's simple. And you shoot uncontested jump shots, because in the pick-and-roll, his guy double-teams me.</p>

<p>&quot;Nick Van Exel's my best friend. He said, 'Boy you've got a chance to take that team somewhere that they never in their wildest desire thought they could reach. He said, 'Man, you're what the doctor ordered for those guys.' A guy who won't put up with some (stuff), a guy who won't let us feel sorry. I'm not going to. No, [bleep] that. You know what I'm saying? We walk into an arena, we're not going to walk into an arena and say, 'Okay, we're going to play for 44 minutes and lose in the last four minutes.' [Bleep] that. You walk into an arena, we say, 'We're going to beat these [bleeps].' Cause there's nothing like beating somebody on their court. Makes the plane ride better, know what I'm saying? That's all it's about, man. We're going to represent well here. But on the road? That's where your pride factor is.</p>

<p>&quot; Who would have thought that this team would advance in the playoffs? Don't give me the credit for it. I'm just going what I've been doing. I'm just doing what I've been doing my whole [bleeping] career. Elton Brand. Corey Maggette was playing all-star basketball until he [bleeped] is foot up. Cuttino Mobley. When Corey got hurt, I had to become the second scorer. Now I can sit up here and play 24 minutes and see the development of Shaun. I'm well rested. So I know I've got to play big from here on out, or it won't be successful. I'm cool. It's all about winning for me. I've done scored points, I've done had assists. It's all about winning for me. Because I want to coach in this league.</p>

<p>&quot;I look at Avery Johnson, what he accomplished, and I want to be that same kind of coach. Here's the job. Do your job. If you can't do your job, somebody else got to come do it.<br />We ain't throwing you away. But for a minute or two - or three or four - somebody else'll step in and do it.</p>

<p>&quot;I tell them, do what you do. Everybody on this team. Do what you do.&quot;</p>
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sound-of-sam.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sound-of-sam.php</guid>
<category>Los Angeles Lakers</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 11:29:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After Nine Seasons, Clippers Back in Playoffs</title>
<description><![CDATA[    In the LOS ANGELES TIMES, Jason Reid writes that &quot;the Clippers return to work today in preparation for their first postseason series in nine seasons. The Clippers are seeded sixth in the Western Conference and have home-court advantage in the first round against the No. 3 Denver Nuggets. Game 1 is Saturday night at Staples Center, and players said they expected to be busy in the meantime. Finally at the point they've strived to reach, the Clippers venture deeper into uncharted waters at full speed.&quot;
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/after-nine-seasons-clippers-back-in-playoffs.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/after-nine-seasons-clippers-back-in-playoffs.php</guid>
<category>Los Angeles Lakers</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:45:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Ray of Hope</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20060420/capt.warw10504200412.nuggets_supersonics_basketball_warw105.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px;" src="http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20060420/capt.warw10504200412.nuggets_supersonics_basketball_warw105.jpg" border="0" alt="Seattle SuperSonics' Ray Allen acknowledges the fans after setting an NBA record for 3-point baskets in a season in the first half of a NBA basketball game in Seattle on Wednesday, April 19, 2006. Allen made his 268th 3-point basket in the second quarter.<br />(AP Photo/Ron Wurzer)" /></a>The season's over, but Ray once again made this team worth watching:<blockquote>SEATTLE (AP) -- Ray Allen broke the NBA record for 3-pointers in a season, finishing with 269, and the Seattle SuperSonics wrapped up their disappointing season with a 109-98 victory over the playoff-bound Denver Nuggets on Wednesday night.<br /><br /><a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/recap?gid=2006041925"><span style="font-style:italic;">Read the rest here.</span></a></blockquote>Other great Ray moments from an otherwise forgettable season?  How about his 42 points and game-winning shot in that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9aWEZxuNQw">insane double-overtime game against the Suns</a>? Or what about his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCKrv_X5Ars">fight against the insane Keyon Dooling</a>? Ah, such sweet memories.<br /><br />So, what are your favorite moments of this terrible, terrible season?  Danny Fortson fouling himself out so he could get back on the exercise bike? Bob Weiss' disappearing act? Let's hear it!
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/a-ray-of-hope.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/a-ray-of-hope.php</guid>
<category>Phoenix Suns</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:44:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clippers, Nuggets Set for Round One</title>
<description><![CDATA[    In the ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS, Aaron Lopez writes that &quot;with a 101-95 loss against the Grizzlies, the Clippers 'secured' the No. 6 seed in the Western Conference and will have home-court advantage in a first-round playoff series against the No. 3 Denver Nuggets. Memphis will be the No. 5 seed and open the playoffs on the road against the fourth-seeded Dallas Mavericks, who have the second-best record in the West. Los Angeles dropped to sixth by losing five of seven games down the stretch, prompting some to wonder whether the Clippers were positioning themselves for a more favorable playoff matchup.&quot;
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/clippers-nuggets-set-for-round-one.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/clippers-nuggets-set-for-round-one.php</guid>
<category>Denver Nuggets</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:17:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nuggets Clinch Northwest</title>
<description>    Carmelo Anthony was only 3 years old the last time the Denver Nuggets won a division title. Anthony scored 28 points to lead Denver to its first division crown since the 1987-88 season with a 110-98 victory over Portland on Monday night.The Northwest Division title came sooner than most expected for the young Nuggets who drafted Anthony with the third pick in the 2003 draft.I don&apos;t think anybody thought we&apos;d be where we are now after three years said Anthony whose 26.8 points leads the team. This is one of the stages we&apos;ve been trying to get to. Now that we&apos;re here we want to move forward and win a playoff series. 
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-clinch-northwest.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-clinch-northwest.php</guid>
<category>Carmelo Anthony</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:56:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Playoff Race Reset</title>
<description><![CDATA[    Alright, since everyone in the league was off last night, it's time to reset the playoff race.<p> I'm going to break down the remaining win probabilities for each of the four teams in the hunt - the Lakers, Kings, Hornets and Jazz. (My previous posts on win probability are <a href="http://www.sactownroyalty.com/story/2006/2/21/131457/988">here</a> and <a href="http://www.sactownroyalty.com/story/2006/3/17/16215/7579">here</a>.)<p> The formula used to predict the win probability for games was borrowed from Ed Kupfer, an illustrious poster at the <a href="http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/viewforum.php?f=1">APBRmetric forum</a>. Specifically in <a href="http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/viewtopic.php?t=14&amp;highlight=">this thread</a>, Kupfer lays out the statistical basis for the WinProb formula, which calculates the probability of a home team winning given winning percentages, location of the game and days of rest for each team.<p> Let's start with the Lakers, who have seven games left:<p> <img src="http://www.sactownroyalty.com/images/admin/lakersprob.jpg"><p> (Let's do some explaining: date, home and away should be obvious. <i>H-Win%</i> and <i>A-Win%</i> are the home and away teams' current winning percentages, respectively. <i>H-Rest</i> is days since the last game for the home team; <i>A-Rest</i> is the same for the away team. <i>H-Prob</i> is the calculated probability of the home team winning. <i>T-Prob</i> is the calculated WinProb for the team in question - in this case, the Lakers.)<p> After the road back-to-back this week, it's almost smooth sailing for the Lakers with their last five games coming at home.<p> The toughest of those five is against Phoenix, who with three days left in the season might take to resting semi-frail Steve Nash and overworked Shawn Marion. Even if the Suns play like they have all season, the Lakers still have a 48% probability of winning. The game is essentially a toss-up.<p> L.A.'s two road games should be losses, with the Lakers having only a 44.8% probability of winning one of them and a 4.8% likelihood of winning both. &nbsp;There's a 60% likelihood the Lakers lose them both.<p> The most likely scenario for the five home games is sadly 4-1, with the loss coming to either the Clippers (who aren't really the away team) or the Suns.<p> So, couple with L.A.'s current record, that would have the Lakers ending the season at 44-38, and easily in the playoffs.<p> Let's move on to our eighth place Kings:<p> <img src="http://www.sactownroyalty.com/images/admin/kingsprob.jpg"><p> As we all know, this week is going to be tough. The likelihood of winning one of the next three is &nbsp;55.9%. The likelihood of winning two is 43.2%. All three? 0.5%. Yikes. Losing all three? 53.3%. Uhh...<p> So the most likely scenario is to go 1-2 this week. The second most likely scenario is to go 0-3. The third is 2-1, and there is an absolutely miniscule chance to 3-0.<p> It looks the best bet is to pray for a split in Texas and hope the dominance of the Clippers continues.<p> But let's assume the worst: 0-3. The Kings close out with 4 of 5 in ARCO. Three of those home games leave the Kings with a strong probability of winning, and the other is Phoenix. The road game is Denver, always a difficult task.<p> So, let's imagine 3-2 in the last five - a near worst-case scenario - coupled with this week's 0-3 worst case scenario. That's finishing 3-5, and leaving the Kings with a 2005-06 regular season record of 41-41.<p> If the Kings can pull out either one game on the current road swing or one of the games against Denver or Phoenix, they'd sit at 42-40, still probably two games behind L.A. for the coveted seventh spot. If they manage to steal one from the Clippers <i>and</i> hold court against Phoenix, they'd be 43-39, still likely a game back.<p> But if the Lakers manage to lose on the home floor to Phoenix and the Clippers - which is very possible - while the Kings hit their likely best-case scenario, then it's gravy. The teams would tie for the seventh position, and (should the scenarios play out) the Kings would hold the tiebreaker advantage. (Since the teams split their four matchups, the next tiebreaker in conference record. If those were even, it'd go to division record. Luckily, because the Kings lost to a wealth of Eastern teams this season, they hold a sturdy advantage in both categories. Of course, had they not lost so many games against Eastern teams, they might not be in this predicament.)<p> So, the Kings really need to go 5-3 to have a shot at seventh place, with the Lakers going 4-3. And yes, that scenario is plausible, if hopeful. And I'm hopeful. So I'm predicting it. There. Happy?<p> Don't sleep on the Hornets, though:<p> <img src="http://www.sactownroyalty.com/images/admin/hornetsprob.jpg"><p> Actually, you might be able to sleep on the Hornets. They have 10 games left, with four likely wins (hosting Golden State, Toronto, Seattle and Utah), one toss-up (versus Cleveland) and five likely losses (at Detroit, Dallas, Sacramento, Phoenix and the Lakers). The Utah game will be tough, and I would guess that the Hornets could steal one at the end of the season from Phoenix or L.A. So, 5-5 seems real reasonable. (For the record, the sum of probabilities is 4.6 - that means the Hornets are expected to win 4.6 of these games. Five seems right.)<p> Going 5-5 would put the Hornets at 40-42. The Kings would have to go 2-6 to fall back to the Hornets at that pace, something very unlikely to happen.<p> But remember that worst-case scenario for the Kings up there? It was 3-5, with losses at Dallas, San Antonio, the Clippers and Denver and a home loss to Phoenix. It didn't count a home loss to the Hornets.<p> What if it was the Hornets instead of the Suns who beat the Kings in ARCO? Then, you'd likely have the Hornets going 6-4 and finishing 41-41. The 3-5 finish would put the Kings at 41-41. The Hornets, having taken two of three from Sacramento already, would have the tiebreaker and make the playoffs.<p> Damn.<p> So, um, like I said: Don't sleep on the Hornets. All they have to do is take care of business at home and beat the Kings in ARCO (and hope the Kings can't win in Texas or SoCal).<p> There's one last team in the hunt - the Utah Jazz:<p> <img src="http://www.sactownroyalty.com/images/admin/jazzprob.jpg"><p> It's actually pretty grim for the Jazz, who still have San Antonio <b>twice</b> and Dallas once. That's like three sure losses. Let's start with that. 0-3.<p> Utah's other road games are in Minnesota and New Orleans. We've assumed New Orleans will hold serve against Utah in Oklahoma City, but I can imagine the Jazz beating the Wolves. That's 1-4.<p> The other four home games for Utah (besides San Antonio's visit tonight) are Portland, Houston, Denver and Golden State. 4-0 in those isn't impossible, but it's unlikely at a 24.1% probability. 3-1 is more likely at 43.4%. So let's go with 3-1.<p> That makes 4-5 total, and a 39-43 record - not even sniffing the playoffs. <p> So the Jazz would have to beat the Hornets (40-42), sweep the non-Spurs home games (41-41) and steal one in their Dallas-San Antonio back-to-back (42-40) to pass a Kings team that finishes 3-5 (which was a worst-case scenario, not counting a Hornets loss). The Jazz, by not having a shot at the tiebreaker with the Kings, need a miracle, really.<p> All theoryball aside, here's what it looks like will happen (through my royal purple tinged glasses):<p> <div class="pre">The Kings will go 5-3, finishing 44-38 and in seventh place.<br> The Lakers will go 4-3, finishing 44-38 and in eighth place due to tiebreakers.<br> The Hornets will go 5-5, finishing 40-42 and in ninth place.<br> The Jazz will go 4-5, finishing 39-43 and in tenth place.</div><p> Bank on it! (Actually, don't.)</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/playoff-race-reset.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/playoff-race-reset.php</guid>
<category>Shawn Marion</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Requiem for Three</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Last week, Glenn Robinson took another <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060331/SPORTS13/603310498/1004/SPORTS">small step</a> in the most unnoticed retirement in the history of sport .  If the absence of fanfare seems unfair, it is also unsurprising.  Despite being physically present for over 10 seasons, Robinson’s moral significance was exhausted in just three.  His 1999-2002 seasons with the Bucks were the one and only time that Robinson’s single-minded dedication to the jump-shot was successfully translated into an effective team offense.  But as historians of the millennial era will doubtlessly note, the story of the Big Dog is also a story of the larger, more mysterious animal he helped inspire: I am speaking of course of The Big Three.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://static.flickr.com/36/123216084_f334a93cbd_o.jpg">
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/36/123216084_f334a93cbd_o.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px;">
</a>
<br>
<br>The Big Three of Robinson, Ray Allen and Sam Cassell was forged in the summer of 1999, and disbanded just three years later.  In their first season, they went 42-40 and lost in the first round.  In their second season, they transformed into the league’s #1 offensive team, went 52-30, and came within a few baskets of making the NBA Finals.  Then in their third and final year, they regressed back to .500 and failed to make the playoffs, despite adding a fourth All-Star to their roster (Anthony Mason) during the previous off-season.   How should we understand the Big Three’s tumultuous tenure, and the role of the Big Dog therein?<br>
<br>When considered in the abstract, nothing about the Big Three makes even the slightest bit of sense.   The majority of great teams have been built around 1 or 2 centers of gravity, with additional talent organized into supporting roles.  The 80s Celtics are the notable exception.  Yet given the particulars of the Milwaukee triumvirate, the precedent they provide is little more than numeric.  Though glory and power was equally distributed among Bird, Parish and McHale, their contributions on offense were differentiated by both personality and position.  In contrast, Allen, Robinson and Cassell seemed to have sprung from a single, interchangeable mold, and appeared functionally, positionally, and even stylistically indistinguishable.  <br>
<br>Perhaps more than any team in the history of professional basketball, Milwaukee was forced to construct its identity without a single, meaningful precedent or guide.  The only principle available to the team was that of “The Big Three” itself.  Indeed, if any thesis should emerge from these reflections, it is that the Three-as-Spirit was no less important than the Three-as-Flesh.  Whereas most teams can define success against existing objective models, the Big Three offense was <i>sui generis</i>.  The only idea to which the Big Three could appeal was its own understanding of what the Big Three should be.  Put somewhat differently: Milwaukee’s offense succeeded only when Robinson, Allen and Cassell could believe in the Big Three, and believe in themselves as part of it.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://static.flickr.com/40/123216089_b78da337ab_o.jpg">
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/40/123216089_b78da337ab_o.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px;">
</a>
<br>
<br>The players’ faith in the Big Three was by no means guaranteed, and was often undermined by objective and subjective pressures.  Among the later were ambiguities inherent in the Big Three itself.  When the nickname was first introduced, the sole rationale was that Cassell, Robinson and Allen combined for 60% of Milwaukee’s offense.  But whether this was a function of actual offensive prowess, or merely a consequence of a crappy bench always remained unclear.  This inherent ambiguity in the value of the Big Three was coupled with an inherent ambiguity in its boundaries.  Insofar as 60% was an arbitrary cut-off point, why shouldn’t there be a Big Four (based on 75% contribution) or Big Two (43%) instead?   <br>
<br>These inherent, subjective ambiguities – when triggered by unfavorable objective events – had the potential of undermining the Big Three’s faith in itself, and thus to derail their collective achievements.   For instance, the selection of Robinson and Allen – but not Cassell – to the 2000 All-Star Game triggered a subjective crisis over the boundaries of Big Three membership.  After starting the season an impressive 25-20, the Bucks spiraled into one of the worst loosing streaks in years, loosing 9 of 11 games after the All-Star announcements.  <br>
<br>
<i>Depending on whom you talk to, Cassell sulked after he was left off the team and didn't distribute the ball, or Allen and Robinson got a little too full of themselves after their selections and never gave the ball up once they had it </i>– The Capital Times (Madison)<br>
<br>The absence of any rational and objective logic underlying the Big Three’s offense meant that team chemistry lived or died with players’ faith in the Big Three itself.  When the subjective coherence of this belief was undermined, the 2000 season was essentially lost.  Two years later, when the Bucks signed Tim Thomas to a $65 million contract and then added Mason - a former All-Star - to Bucks’ starting lineup, the boundaries of the Big Three were once again blurred to the point that Cassell, Allen, and Robinson could no longer command it.  This in addition to injuries and infighting made the third and final Big Three season even worse than the first.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://static.flickr.com/38/123216087_ddb9d14bed_o.jpg">
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/38/123216087_ddb9d14bed_o.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px;">
</a>
<br>
<br>The second season was the closest the Big Three would come to an unconditional faith in its own self-determination.  And throughout this season, no player’s faith was as strong as Glenn Robinson.  Ray Allen may have been the spark behind the Big Three, and Cassell the glue, but Robinson was its chief architect and prophet.  When George Karl threatened to bench one of the three (it didn’t matter which) in order to teach them a lesson about teamwork, Robinson was defiant.  Speaking in what can only be described as the 9th person, he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:<br>
<br> <i>You can't afford to bench one of the Big Three…When he says benching one of the Big Three, I don't know why. I know the chemistry of this team is shooting jumpers. That's our identity.  That's what we are” </i>
<br>
<br>And while Robinson often resisted sharing with Allen and Cassell as individuals, sharing with the Big Three was an entirely different story.  Commenting after one game, he told reporters:<br>
<br>
<i>"It was one of the better games for the Big Three," he (Robinson) said. "I like the games when I see all of the Big Three with 20 points or more. When we score like that, it's hard to beat us”.</i>
<br>
<br>Given how closely Robinson identified with the Three, it makes sense that his post-Three fortunes would be the dimmest.  Interestingly, all three players went on to form Big Threes with their subsequent teams (as defined by 60% offensive contribution).  Yet while the recent era has seem its share of imitators, none can rival the original Big Three, or the Man who once inspired it.  And if the owl of minerva flies only at dusk, our understanding of both has only just begun.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://static.flickr.com/43/123216085_52e3db7f32_o.jpg">
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/43/123216085_52e3db7f32_o.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px;">
</a>
</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/requiem-for-three.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/requiem-for-three.php</guid>
<category>Milwaukee Bucks</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:42:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Familiar Eisley Nice Fit for Nuggets</title>
<description><![CDATA[    &quot;When the Nuggets traded Earl Watson in February, they decided to bring in an emergency point guard, someone who could learn the system fast and be ready if needed,&quot; writes Phil Miller of THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE. Howard Eisley was the result, and so far, &quot;it's been a good match.&quot;
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/familiar-eisley-nice-fit-for-nuggets.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/familiar-eisley-nice-fit-for-nuggets.php</guid>
<category>Denver Nuggets</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nuggets Coming Down the Home-Court Stretch</title>
<description><![CDATA[    Aaron J. Lopez of the ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS writes, &quot;The last time the Denver Nuggets clinched a division title, the celebration called for champagne. Eighteen years later, a grindstone and a swig of Gatorade might be more appropriate.&quot; 
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-coming-down-the-homecourt-stretch.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-coming-down-the-homecourt-stretch.php</guid>
<category>Denver Nuggets</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:49:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sixers&apos; late-game woes continue</title>
<description>    Carmelo Anthony scored 29 points, including the go-ahead basket with 18.9 seconds left, and Ruben Patterson added 20 to lead the Denver Nuggets to their third straight win, 97-93 over the Philadelphia 76ers on Thursday night.

Marcus Camby had 13 points, 14 rebounds and one of the Nuggets&apos; two blocks on Philadelphia&apos;s last true possession that allowed them to hang on for their first three-game winning streak since Jan. 14-25. Denver also improved to six games over .
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sixers-lategame-woes-continue.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sixers-lategame-woes-continue.php</guid>
<category>Carmelo Anthony</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:40:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nuggets Open Season-Long Road Trip In Philly</title>
<description>    Nuggets Open Season-Long Road Trip In Philly -- - The Denver Nuggets embark on a season-long seven-game road trip tonight when they visit the Philadelphia 76ers at the Wachovia Center.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-open-seasonlong-road-trip-in-philly.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-open-seasonlong-road-trip-in-philly.php</guid>
<category>Denver Nuggets</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:39:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nuggets starting to pull away in Northwest</title>
<description>    Denver has won two in a row and will welcome the Milwaukee Bucks on Monday night to the Pepsi Center.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-starting-to-pull-away-in-northwest.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nuggets-starting-to-pull-away-in-northwest.php</guid>
<category>Milwaukee Bucks</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Welcome Back Earl!</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <script type="text/javascript">window.document.getElementById('post-440').parentNode.className += ' adhesive_post';</script>	<p><strong>The Team has now made this report official with a press release just arriving.  Also confirmed is that the pick is a 2008 second rounder:</strong></p>
	<p>“We drafted Earl in 2001 after his solid career at UCLA, and it will be great to have him back with the Sonics,” said Sonics General Manager Rick Sund. “With his talent, we’ll have a good flow at the point-guard position. We thank Reggie and Vitaly for their hard work over the past few years and wish them the best of luck in Denver and Sacramento.”<a id="more-440"></a></p>
	<p>Earl Watson is a Sonic once again.  ESPN reports a <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2341845">Three-way deal that brings Watson to Sonics</a>.  While Watson&#8217;s salary will be a source for debate, no one can deny that this upgrades our back court and gives us the solid back up PG we have desperately needed this season.  I was a big fan of Earl during his short stint here, it was sad to see him leave after being left off the playoff roster by Nate MacMillan.  While Watson is expensive, it is a clear signal that Seattle is willing to spend money to fill the holes in this roster.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.nba.com/playerfile/earl_watson/">Earl Watson&#8217;s Bio</a>
</p>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/welcome-back-earl.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/welcome-back-earl.php</guid>
<category>Denver Nuggets</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:11:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ruben Movin&apos;</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4989/1110/1600/colorado.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4989/1110/320/colorado.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal">  </p>So it finally happened.  <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3274">Ruben Patterson</a> and <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3194">Charles Smith</a> are on their way to Denver along with <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3663">Reggie Evans</a>, <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=2669">Voshon Lenard</a> and <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3106">Vitaly "The Potato" Potepenko</a>  (credit for that nick goes to Nuss at <a href="http://www.supersonicsoul.com/">SuperSonicSoul</a>) are new Blazers, and <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3549">Earl Watson</a>, <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=1316">Byron Russell</a>, and Denver's 2nd rounder are on the way to Seattle as we type.  I gotta say that I like this trade, as it we rid ourselves of the Rube and we don't take back much.  Lenard provides a decent stop-gap at SG and, probably most importantly, comes off the books next year, while Vitaly, though basically worthless, only makes about 3 million a year and is an upgrade from our third string turned starting center Ha.  Ruben had some <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/sports/1140681533242750.xml&coll=7">nice things to say</a> after the loss to the Bobcats last night regarding his situation.  So for hopefully the last time, take it away Ruben:<br /><p class="MsoNormal"></p><blockquote>"This might be my last one. Thought I'd go out with a bang.  This is it. I mean, let me be free. They need to trade me for a big man. This has gotta be my last game. I know the trading deadline is tomorrow and nothing against the fans of <st1 :city st="on"><st1 :place st="on"><st1 :place st="on"><st1 :city st="on">Portland</st1></st1></st1></st1>, but I just want to be happy. Hopefully, things go right for me. I just want to start my career over."</blockquote><br />Yes Ruben, 30 year-old back-up small forwards are setting the NBA on fire, and I'm sure you'll be the next to do so.  Besides Ruben, I'll save my sympathy for Charles Smith, as he has the unlucky fortune of having to continue to serve as your teammate, and the citizens of <st1 :state st="on"><st1 :place st="on"><st1 :state st="on"><st1 :place st="on">Colorado</st1></st1></st1></st1>, as if they haven't had enough experiance with NBA players moonlighting as  <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0924041kobea1.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">sex offenders</span></a>.  I'm guessing Rube is going to be getting the majority of time at shooting guard, because he sure as hell isn't getting his personally mandated 25 minutes a night behind <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3706">Carmelo</a>.  <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/nuggets/ci_3537323">George Karl</a> has said that he likes Ruben's game, though Rube's game has never been the problem.  Time will tell whether or not Karl will like Ruben's mouth, attitude, and his way with the ladies.<br /><p></p><p class="MsoNormal">The move also reunites Ruben with his old <st1 :city st="on"><st1 :place st="on"><st1 :city st="on"><st1 :place st="on">Cincinnati</st1></st1></st1></st1> partner in crime Kenyon Martin.  No word yet on whether or not Bob Huggins is sober enough to be brought on as an assistant coach, but Karl is definitely going to need someone around to dole out hush money to the scores of traumatized Denver residents whom Rube and K-Mart will undoubtedly leave in their wake.<br /></p><p class="MsoNormal">So Denver gets some defense, Seattle gets a back-up PG with a hella long contract and a decrepit Byron Russell, and Portland gets a back-up PF/C and a little cap room, and one less Ruben Patterson.  Wrap it up; I'll take it.  So long Ruben, don't forget to <a href="http://sor.state.co.us/default.asp">register</a> when you get to <st1 :state st="on"><st1 :place st="on"><st1 :state st="on"><st1 :place st="on">Colorado</st1></st1></st1></st1>, you <a href="http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=11664">scum bag</a>.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Update:</span> It seems as if I spoke too soon.  Rumor is <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/weblogs/blazersblog/index.ssf?/mtlogs/olive_blazerblog/archives/2006_02.html#115435">the deal</a> now has <a href="http://hoopshype.com/players/brian_skinner.htm">Brian Skinner</a> coming to the Blazers from Sacto instead of Vitaly, in exchange for Sergei.  Potepenko supposedly is off to the Kings, and the Blazers are still getting Lenard.  I liked the first version a lot better.  Skinner makes <a href="http://hoopshype.com/salaries/sacramento.htm">too damn much</a>.  This still hasn't been finalized, so who knows what it will look like when everything shakes out.</p>
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/ruben-movin.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/ruben-movin.php</guid>
<category>Kenyon Martin</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:10:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
