<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>HOOPLOG: Nick Collison</title>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/nick-collison/index.php</link>
<description>NBA basketball news, rumors, insider analysis and more from around the country.  Updated hourly by Team RxSN.</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:30:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Collison Out Month With Foot Injury</title>
<description><![CDATA[    Percy Allen of THE SEATTLE TIMES writes, &quot;Sonics forward Nick Collison's roller-coaster season took another downward turn on Monday. An MRI exam revealed a partial tear of the plantar fascia in his left foot that will require a four-week recovery.&quot;
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/collison-out-month-with-foot-injury.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/collison-out-month-with-foot-injury.php</guid>
<category>Nick Collison</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:30:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Let trading season begin</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <script type="text/javascript">window.document.getElementById('post-416').parentNode.className += ' adhesive_post';</script>	<p>The Seattle Supersonics made news last night by trading Vladimir Radmanovic to the Los Angeles Clippers for PF Chris Wilcox in a move that didn’t stay in the headlines long.  First the move was overshadowed by a piss-poor effort against the Milwaukee Bucks.  Secondly that trade became secondary news to rumors that the Orlando Magic were on the verge of acquiring former number two overall pick Darko Milicic and possibly trading away guard Steve Francis.  </p>
	<p>With all these rumors running rampant and the trade deadline just over a week away it is clear that trade season is fully upon us. <a id="more-416"></a></p>
	<p>With yesterday’s move the Sonics front office proved many people wrong.</p>
	<p>First there is the concept that this front office doesn’t make trades.  Over the last several years the team has turned over virtually their entire roster.  Only SF Rashard Lewis remains from the team Rick Sund inherited.  Each season fans have called for a trade of Radmanovic only to hear that the front office was asking for too much in return.  What they were asking for, reportedly was Wilcox.</p>
	<p>This team is not afraid to pull the trigger, they are however exceedingly deliberate in their dealings both contract wise and in terms of trades.  Sund frequently outlines how the seeds of a trade are often planted a year, or years in advance through dialogue with opposing General Managers.  This is likely one of those scenarios as the Sonics were rumored to have had interest in Wilcox nearly since the day of his draft.</p>
	<p>The second point proven today is probably more important to the team.  By trading Radmanovic the team took a step to dispel the notion that players on one year qualifying deals have no value.  Radmanovic, along with teammates Reggie Evans, and Flip Murray all accepted one year qualifying offers to make themselves unrestricted free agents at the end of this season.  According to the league’s collective bargaining agreement all three can be traded, but only with their permission, and by granting permission the players will waive “Bird Rights” for the team that acquires them.   These particular trade restrictions are new to the CBA this year and there some serious doubts whether any team would trade an asset of substance for a player under those circumstances.  By getting any value at all for Radmanovic the team surprised me, and likely many other teams in the league.  The hope is that this will set a precedent for Evans and Murray to be moved when GM’s assemble at next weeks all-star gathering.</p>
	<p>So what exactly does this move mean for the team?  Clippers Coach Mike Dunleavy pretty much summed up why this deal made sense for both teams in this morning’s LA Times.</p>
	<p> &#8220;It&#8217;s an opportunity to add a player to our system who brings a totally different dimension,&#8221; Dunleavy said when describing Radmanovic.  &#8220;We have a bunch of guys who are pretty good low-post players, but we were looking for a guy who could do it more from distance.”</p>
	<p>Take that comment, turn it around to say “&#8221;We have a bunch of guys who could do it from a distance, but we were looking for a guy who is good in the low post.” And you have your answer as to why this is a good deal for both teams.</p>
	<p>Wilcox plays above the rim and excels at running the floor.  He is not the greatest team defender but does protect the basket with athleticism and shot blocking ability that have been lacking from this team at the power forward spot.  For the last several years the team has focused on savy players such as Nick Collison who focus on team ball.  The hope is that a blend of the two types of players will produce a product which is better than the pieces combined.  </p>
	<p>Somewhere between Keon Clark and Jermaine O’Neil the acquisition of Wilcox, if it pans out, changes the fundamental nature of this team by providing balance to a roster that has for several years been unbalanced.  No longer will the team have to rely on a gimmicky philosophy of “spreading the floor with their big men”.  Between Wilcox, Swift, Petro, and Collison they can at least make a basic attempt to play a more traditional game.  No longer will they attempt to coach around their physical limitations in the frontcourt.  They have enough physical ability to go around.</p>
	<p>This is a great first move but the guard rotation remains critically undermanned as Flip Murray continues his Radmanovic-esque slide to complete uselessness.  By moving Radmanovic the team cleared the path for Damien Wilkens to see additional minutes at the backup SF position.  He should now play exclusively at the SG and and SF position.  This leaves the team with a crippling shortage of ballhandlers and the need to make one more move for a backup PG.  Marko Jaric of the Timberwolves and  Earl Watson of the Nuggets are guards most closely linked to the Sonics in the rumor mill, but fans should keep in mind that this notoriously tight lipped front office likes to swing deals out of the blue.  The Radmanovic for Wilcox trade had not appeared in a publication for nearly a year before it happened.  I would expect the Sonics to grab a guard nobody is expecting without a peep being leaked to the press.</p>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/let-trading-season-begin.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/let-trading-season-begin.php</guid>
<category>Milwaukee Bucks</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:34:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SIMULBLOG FOR SONICS V. BOBCATS</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sonics 56 Bobcats 46 at the half</span>
<br>Sonics go on an 8-0 run with 6 of those points coming on the fast break<br>Sups force 7 turnovers in the 2nd Quarter for a good defensive quarter.<br>Rashard Lewis has 19 points and looks awesome.<br>Very good shot distrubution by the Sups in the first half, Lewis 13, Allen 11, Radman 5.<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sonics 48 Bobcats 44 with 3:01 left in the 2nd Quarter</span>
<br>Off the Topic – Nate Robinson started tonight for the Knicks and played 35 minutes.<br>Nate had 14-3-2.<br>The Bobcats are great in transition.  When they get out they get 2.  They are brutal in the half court<br>Ray Allen’s strength is not dribbling and he is getting the ball too much early in the shot clock and it allows the defense to put all of its focus on Allen and it is resulting in some turnovers.<br>The Bobcats are shooting 56% they might not be able to do that in a gym by themselves.<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sonics 44 Bobcats 36 with 5:16 left in the 2nd Quarter</span>
<br>Melvin Ely has a really good low post game for the Bobcats<br>The Sonics offensive ball movement has been very good<br>Seattle has gone to a zone and it is causing the Bobcats a ton of trouble.<br>The Bobcats are committing a ton of turnovers and the Sonics are getting out and going.<br>The Soncis have done a great job of keeping the Bobcats out of transition<br>Luke Ridnour left with a slightly sprained ankle<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sonics 30 Bobcats 24 at the end of 1 Quarter</span>
<br>Lewis carries the load with 5 of 6 shooting and 11 points<br>For the most part the Sonics have done a very good job of keeping the game in the half court and the Bobcats can’t score in the halfcourt.  <br>Okeafor has no jump shot.  He is amazingly limited for a guy who won rookie of the year.<br>Ray Allen went to the bench with the Sonics up 4. One of our storylines is how they do with Allen on the bench.<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sonics 18 Bobcats 9 with 5:53  left in the 1st Quarter</span>
<br>Sonics come out on fire.  Hitting their first 6 shots.<br>Nick Collison gets two fouls by the 8:00 mark.  That has always been my concern with Collison is whether or not he can avoid foul trouble as a starting power forward.<br>Petro replaces Collison.<br>Sonics are working on containment defensively.  Trying to avoid the penetration.<br>Gerald Wallace and Kareem Rush may have a tough time guarding Lewis and Allen.<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">STORYLINES</span>
<br>1) The Bobcats can't score the Sonics can't defend<br>2) Sonics turnovers.  The bobcats average forcing 20% of opponents possesions as turnovers.<br>3) Can the Sonics survive without Ray Allen on the floor.<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Some numbers that make you saw wow</span>
<br>In the last 5 losses the Sonics have allowed 187 free throws<br>In the last 6 games opponents have shot 38 of 78 from 3.<br>In the last 3 games the Sonics have allowed 105 free throws.<br>The average defensive efficiency in the NBA is 102.  If you allow more then 109 you are in a lot of trouble.  In all but 3 games the Sonics have had a defensive efficiency that was over 109.  That makes it just about impossible to win.<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">INACTIVES</span>
<br>Sonics inactives:   Mikki Moore, Rick Brunson and Danny Fortson.<br>Bobcats inactives:  Sean May</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/simulblog-for-sonics-v-bobcats.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/simulblog-for-sonics-v-bobcats.php</guid>
<category>Gerald Wallace</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:23:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Via Chicago</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">With a loss last night the Bulls dropped to 3-4, which isn’t terrible but is good enough for last place in the strong Central. But even before the loss last night coach Scott Skiles was talking about shaking up his starting lineup, and he just might follow through with it now. So with the shakeup and the new starting jobs won, there should be some new players with fantasy relevance, right? Not necessarily.<br>
<br>It’s always best for a player’s value if he has a starting job, but you still have to get the minutes. Skiles has shown absolutely no reluctance to start a player and still hold his minutes down. So let’s look at da Bulls. I’ve seen at least a bit of almost all of their games, but perhaps someone in the Windy City … <a href="http://www.givemetherock.com/">GMTR</a>, looking in your direction … would like to offer some more insight.<br>
<br>
<strong>The Sure Thing</strong>
<br>There’s only one and it’s <strong>Kirk Hinrich</strong>. Hinrich’s numbers aren’t quite where they should be, but they are close enough to the norm that there’s no reason to expect anything too far off from last year’s. His steals and rebounds are down, his percentages are up, those should all even out. He’s actually averaging less than 33 mpg, but that’s because of three low-minute games, only one of which was due to Skiles. (A sprained ankle and foul trouble – which is a definite problem for Hinrich – caused the other two.) Hinrich is the constant for the Bulls, but Skiles will still bench him for the entire end of a rout, as he did on Monday, for example. Still, his game-to-game performance is consistent enough to leave him in all lineups, no questions asked.<br>
<br>
<strong>Coming On Strong</strong>
<br>
<strong>Andres Nocioni</strong> has started every game so far, but has only come to life in the last three. After seeing less than 25 minutes in each of the first four games, Nocioni has gone 27-31-45 in the last three, and he’s put up a 16.7/5.7/1.3 line. He’s also chipped in five 3s, three blocks and a steal. Nocioni is one of those hustle guys that a coach – especially a guy like Skiles – can get enamored with, and when things are going well it looks like he’s a part of everything. It should be noted that his two best games have come in Bulls losses, but Nocioni should have a lock on his starting job. He seems like he’d make a decent short-term pickup right now, but don’t get too excited. Nocioni played 45 minutes last night and Scott Skiles just doesn’t let that happen too much.<br>
<br>There was probably a run on <strong>Mike Sweetney</strong> after his 26 and 14 performance last night. Sweetney replacing Darius Songaila would be the most obvious lineup switch, as you could make the argument that Sweetney is one of the Bulls two or three best players. He can be a real fantasy force if given the opportunity, as he is one of the best rebounders in the league on a per minute basis. The knock on him as been his lack of steals and blocks, and while it’s true that he doesn’t offer much there, he’s a career 53% shooter and gets to the foul line a lot and makes a good number. But I’ll believe Skiles gives him that chance when I see it. The problem is that he has to deal with both Songaila and <strong>Othella Harrington</strong>. Scott Skiles loves to play his whole roster and will routinely give 10 or 11 players at least 10 minutes per game. This makes it tough for anyone to have value, because there’s a huge difference between 29 minutes and 35 minutes. With a few more games like last night Sweetney could force Skiles’ hand, though. I spent my last round pick on Sweetney because I liked his upside and thought it would only be a matter of time before he grabbed a starting job. If you have a roster spot to play with, Sweetney is a nice option. He’s got more upside than <strong>Nick Collison</strong>, for example, but because Collison is starting, he’s a better short-term option than Sweetney.<br>
<br>
<strong>Luol Deng</strong> is still just 20 years old, so he’s a player that you can expect considerable improvement from. He seems unlikely to crack the starting lineup right now with Nocioni playing so well, but you can’t rule it out at some point in the season. But until Deng shows that he’s capable of a special skill relevant to fantasy players, he won’t be of much value. Sweetney can dominate in boards and FG%; Deng dominates nowhere. He has just three steals, three blocks and two 3s on the season. Deng has shown good scoring ability, but you have to score a whole lot of points to be valuable without other contributions, especially when it’ll be a miracle if you shoot even 44%.<br>
<br>
<strong>Ben Gordon</strong> is the perfect example of a guy who Scott Skiles is keeping down. His minutes this season are up to 29.3 from 24.4 but it’s more of a tease than anything. If he could get to that 33-35 mark, Gordon would be a no-brainer starter. But with fluctuating minutes coming off the bench, it’s a day-to-day guessing game. He went 23/6/4 with three 3s on Nov. 5, but followed that with 13/1/1 on 5-of-17 shooting. He scored 17 with two 3s on 7-of-10 shooting on Nov. 12 and followed that with 6 points on 2-of-12 shooting. This is a perfect example of why bench players are so risky. There’s very little margin for error. The fewer minutes, the fewer chances to rack up stats in all of the categories, so if you don’t come through in your strength, it kills you.<br>
<br>
<strong>Fading Fast<br>
</strong>I thought <strong>Tyson Chandler</strong> would be a better player to own than <strong>Marcus Camby</strong> this year. Oops. Camby could still go down, but Chandler may as well be down for how well he’s played so far. The Bulls don’t have any other real options in the middle, so you’d expect Chandler’s starting job to be safe, but Chandler excelled coming off the bench last year and Skiles may think he’s more comfortable there. Othella Harrington is one of those “reliable vets” and I wouldn’t put it against Skiles to start him at center if the matchup presents itself. Chandler has just four blocks on the season, and those were all in the first two games, meaning he’s gone five straight without one. Owners weren’t expecting many points, but were counting on at least 10 boards and 2 blocks per game. Frustrated Chandler owners might be willing to cut bait after he received just 39 minutes total in the last two games. If you can pick him up on the cheap, go for it. The Bulls have been disappointed in their defensive performance, and even though Chandler has been a part of that, he’s still the key to their success there. He’s also the only player that can man the middle and Skiles seems to have little choice but to play him. Perhaps he’s gotten a little content after signing his offseason contract extension, but seven games is still just seven games.<br>
<br>Nobody in their right minds thought <strong>Chris Duhon</strong> would keep up his pace from the season’s first two games. Since then he’s averaged 6.3/1.8/4 with 0.5 steals and .8 3s. And it’s not like he’s been hurting for playing time, either. Skiles loves the guy, but if he keeps shooting 33%, he’s not going to have much choice but to keep him on the bench more. The chance to sell high on Duhon is passed and it’s unlikely anyone would have taken the bait then anyway. Except for the deepest of leagues, he just doesn’t merit a roster spot.<br>
<br>In the season opener <strong>Darius Songaila</strong> hit a big three-pointer to force overtime and finished with a respectable 11/5/5, two steals, one 3 performance. He’s barely matched those totals since then. He’s seen just 11 minutes in each of the past three games, and he was never a fantasy factor, but now he’s a complete afterthought. But as previously stated, those 11 minutes could be put to better use elsewhere. Why oh why can’t you just sit him on the bench all game, Skiles? Are you going to miss the 2/4/3 on 1-of-6 shooting that Songaila has <i>totaled</i> in 33 minutes over the last three games?<br>
<br>
<strong>Bottom Line</strong>
<br>So what have we learned? Well, be skeptical is all I’m saying. Guys like Sweetney and Gordon are very tempting, but can be the ultimate frustration. If there’s one thing to drives you crazy, it’s seeing a guy having a great game on your bench, plugging him into the lineup and then seeing him put up a clunker. And the way Skiles runs his rotation in Chicago, there’s always a decent chance of that happening. Guys like Songaila, Harrington, <strong>Eric Piatkowski</strong> and Jannero <strong>Pargo</strong> seem to exist only to frustrate fantasy owners. Coaches patterns can’t be ignored, and I’ll actually have a column up over the weekend talking about some of the most frustrating ones, and how to deal with them.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/via-chicago.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/via-chicago.php</guid>
<category>Chicago Bulls</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:04:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Roundup: Sonics pick up Ridnour, Collison options</title>
<description><![CDATA[    Sonics pick up Ridnour, Collison options<br /><br /> by Associated Press<br /><br />
Seattle SuperSonics: The SuperSonics on Thursday picked up
options on guard Luke Ridnour and forward Nick Collison for the
2006-07 season.<br /><br />	   Financial terms of the options were not released.<br /><br />	   Both played in all 82 games last season, but it was...
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/roundup-sonics-pick-up-ridnour-collison-options.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/roundup-sonics-pick-up-ridnour-collison-options.php</guid>
<category>Nick Collison</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:20:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>2005 Fantasy Tiers by Position: Power Forwards.</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Taken early, a power forward can really help shape your draft.  Taking a center-esque PF like <strong>Elton Brand </strong>in the first couple rounds means you can hold off on a center for a good while.  Taking a PF that can step outside and knock down a three like <strong>Dirk Nowitzki </strong>early means you can wait a bit before taking a SG or SF, and concentrate on the scarcity positions.<br>
<br>Taken late, though, your options drop pretty dramatically.  Power forwards don’t go terribly deep, mostly because anybody listed as a F/C is undoubtedly going to be played as a center.  Luckily, there’s only one PF spot on your roster.  Still, it’s nice to have a couple of options at every position, so try to grab two of these guys:<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier One:<br>
</u>Kevin Garnett, Dirk Nowitzki</strong>
<br>
<br>These guys should be off the board after four picks – maybe three.  Garnett is up there with LeBron for the top player in the game, while Nowitzki might not qualify at center anymore, but still is an incredible value as a 7-category player.<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier Two:<br>
</u>Elton Brand, Jermaine O’Neal, Chris Bosh.<br>
</strong>
<br>These are your faux-centers.  They block.  They rebound.  They score.  If they qualified at center (as they all once did), they’d have incredible value.  But they don’t.  Still, with centers being at such a premium, guys who act like centers are pretty useful.  It may be the difference between reaching for a guy like Zydraunas Ilgauskas in the 4th and being able to wait for someone like Nenad Krstic in the 7th or 8th.<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier Three:<br>
</u>Dwight Howard, Rasheed Wallace, Pau Gasol.<br>
</strong>
<br>Admittedly, Chris Bosh likely belongs in this group.  But we here at FBB really like him this year.  Also, Rasheed Wallace probably belongs with the Centers, but seriously, he’s not a center.  We had to take a stand.  Anyhow, these guys all could end up with top-25 value, but could also end up somewhere in the 40’s on the player rater at the end of the year.  You can’t be terribly excited about any of them, but at some point they do become the best pick.<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier Four:<br>
</u>Carlos Boozer, Kenyon Martin, Chris Webber, Zach Randolph<br>
</strong>
<br>I’m not a huge fan of any of these guys.  All of them are injury risks, all of them have question marks on the court, and a two of them (Randolph and Boozer) are really 3-category guys, and that’s it.  Still, if they slip late enough and you can grab any of these guys in the 5th or 6th round, they could be great value.<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier Five:</u>
<br>Antawn Jamison, Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Tyson Chandler.<br>
</strong>
<br>These are some small tiers, huh?  But that’s just because this position is so thin and varied.  Here are the guys that you know you can have on your team and they’ll produce as long as they stay healthy.  They might not produce a ton, but they’ll at least have marginal value.<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier Six:<br>
</u>Donyell Marshall, Drew Gooden, Al Jefferson, Kurt Thomas, Darius Songaila, Troy Murphy, PJ Brown.<br>
</strong>
<br>This tier are guys who really have an outside chance of being really valuable, but could just as easily be terrible, but JUST good enough that you can’t drop them.  Every position has this tier – with Small Forwards it was the third tier.  Here, it’s the sixth.  DM is a huge fan of Donyell Marshall and he wants him to be much higher, but too bad!   I think Troy Murphy could just as easily be a Tier 4 or 5 player.<br>
<br>
<strong>
<u>Tier Seven:<br>
</u>Nick Collison, Eddie Griffin, Joe Smith, Kwame Brown, Vladimir Radmanovic, Udonis Haslem.</strong>
<br>
<br>This tier could really be broken into high-risk high-reward guys (Kwame, Griffin) and low-but-solid value (Radmanovic, Smith).  But we’re tired of all these three-person tiers.  Given injuries, playing time, etc., all of these guys might end up with mid-round value, but some things are going to have to fall into place before that happens.  Still, they’re all worth late-round flyers.<br>
<br>Tomorrow, we’ll wrap up positional tiers, with Centers.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/2005-fantasy-tiers-by-position-power-forwards.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/2005-fantasy-tiers-by-position-power-forwards.php</guid>
<category>Nick Collison</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:54:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>High Noon</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">If there's one line you take away from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, it's Paul Newman's ubiquitous "Who are those guys?" Newman repeats it over and over again, in reference to his pursuers, and usually in exasperation.<br>
<br>I have a feeling the Spurs feel that way about the Sonics this series. Far from a cakewalk, Seattle has posed a formidable challenge to San Antonio, both talent-wise and physically. From Danny Fortson's hard fouls to Antonio Daniels offensive skills, the Sonics have demonstrated they are - while not the equal of the Spurs - at least in the same neighborhood. In doing so, they've given Sonic fans reason to love their team. Damien Wilkins' brilliant game 4, Luke Ridnour's same, AD's consistent play, the courage of Ray Allen, the improvement of Nick Collison, Jerome James' 7-for-7 game 3, great memories every single one.<br>
<br>Sadly, the euphoria we've been feeling may end tonight. As Ray Allen mentioned in the Times today, this could be the last home game any of these Sonics play in Seattle. After all, a win only guarantees a return trip to Texas, where as Fortson said, "I'm sick of that Riverwalk."<br>
<br>What can we look for tonight? The Sonics will inevitably jump out to an early lead, buouyed by an enthusiastic crowd and more than a tablespoon of desparation. The key as in all the of the games this series, will be Seattle's ability to free Ray Allen from Bruce Bowen. If the Sonics can find a way to get Allen some open looks early, I have a feeling he could go for 40 points tonight. <br>
<br>After a crushing defeat on Tuesday, I predict Seattle will respond tonight. Vegas says Spurs by 5 1/2. I say Sonics 108 - Spurs 103.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/high-noon.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/high-noon.php</guid>
<category>San Antonio Spurs</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 17:51:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SONICS WIN!  SONICS WIN!</title>
<description><![CDATA[    <img src="http://www.supersonicsoul.com/evans-spurs.jpg" alt="Seattle SuperSonics forward Reggie Evans (30) gestures after scoring in front of San Antonio Spurs forward Robert Horry, left, in the third quarter, Thursday, May 12, 2005, in Game 3 of the second round of the NBA Playoffs in Seattle.<br />(AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)"/><br /><br />Who says these guys can't play defense?<br /><br />The Sonics made big stops in the fourth quarter to defeat the Spurs, <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2005051225">92-91</a>.  San Antonio wilted under pressure down the stretch, missing clutch free throws and wide open threes.  Seattle, meanwhile, had big games from Nick Collison, Antonio Daniels, and "Big Game" Jerome James, who was 7-7 from the field.<br /><br />Let us enjoy this victory, my friends: It's a whole new series.
            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sonics-win-sonics-win.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sonics-win-sonics-win.php</guid>
<category>San Antonio Spurs</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 23:41:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Round One Report Card</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img alt="Seattle SuperSonics Jerome James wears a plastic garbage bag as a cape as he celebrates the Sonics 122-118 win over the Sacramento Kings Tuesday, May 3, 2005, in Game 5 of the first round Western Conference playoff at KeyArena in Seattle. The win will allow the Sonics to advance to the next round of the playoffs. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)" src="http://www.supersonicsoul.com/james-bag.jpg">
<br>
<span style="font-size:78%;">J.J. would've received an A+ if he hadn't worn a garbage bag like a crazy person.</span>
<br>
<br>With the first round in the books, I thought it’d be interesting to revisit how each Sonic did. Here’s a quick and dirty on the contributors to OUR FIRST SERIES WIN ON THE WAY TO A CHAMPIONSHIP, BABY! YOU SUCK, SAC-O-TOMATOES! KINGS? HUH, YOU GUYS AREN’T EVEN JESTERS!<br>
<br>Okay, I’m calm again, so here goes:<br>
<br>Ray Allen – A+. I think even the biggest Ray-hater (yours truly), has to admit he stepped it up to historic proportions. An average of 32 points, 2 steals, 5 boards, and 5 assists is positively Jordan-esque, and add in a tremendous 2nd-half in game 4 when the Sonics really needed him, and, well, he just could not have done any more.<br>
<br>Luke Ridnour – B-. I’m sorry, but shooting 31% from the field won’t cut it. His lack of D on Bibby didn’t help, either. Saying that, you’ve got to wonder why he rates even a B-, and that’s where his tremendous ballhandling and lack of turnovers raised his grade. 1.5 turnovers in 30 minutes is fantastic, and Cool Hand Luke deserves all the credit for that. His game improved as the series wore on, and I expect him to do reasonably well in round 2.<br>
<br>Rashard Lewis – B+. Lewis’ D on Peja was the unsung story of this series. The Kings’ SF was dynamite in games 4 and 5, but in games 1 to 3 he was a nonentity, and Lewis deserves credit for that. Yeah, Peja was injured and he always stinks in the playoffs, but Lewis still managed to hold him in check. Shard’s offense showed up in games 4 and 5 (not coincidentally, when Peja began to score as well). Count on big things from him if the Sonics meet the Spurs, as SA is going to have matchup hell guarding him (he shot 51% against the Spurs this season).<br>
<br>Reggie Evans – C+. After a 15-rebound performance in game 1, Mr. Glass sort of disappeared in the rest of the series. His frenetic energy was always appreciated, but he was never the best PF on the Sonics: that role belonged to Nick Collison.<br>
<br>Jerome James – A-. Unbelievable. I was trying to explain to my wife how incredible his transformation was, and the only way I could was to tell her to imagine if next week she decided to run the Vancouver Marathon, and not only finished, but beat out all those Kenyan chicks. Again, unbelievable.<br>
<br>Nick Collison – B+. You’ve got to love this guy. I didn’t appreciate his game early in the season, but his knack for finding the ball is wonderful, and he handles the rock in the paint better than any Sonic big man – JJ included. His 15-point, 9-board performance in game 5 has me looking forward to a full season of him as a starter.<br>
<br>AD – B-. The only reason he doesn’t grab a C is his fantastic job in the 2nd half of game 5. Anybody else notice that Luke rode the pine for the entire 4th quarter while my man AD ran the show? Like Ridnour, he handled the rock well, and, like Ridnour, he shot like crap most of the series. AD’s tendency to dribble around the court can drive you nuts, but his tenacious D and passion is always appreciated.<br>
<br>Radman – C-. 6 points per game is lousy for a guy whose defense is subpar to begin with. A decent game 2, but other than that, a non-entity.<br>
<br>Fortson – C-. Like Radman, a non-entity. Like Radman, his only decent game was in game 2, but his proclivity for fouls and T’s earned him too much bench time to be of any use. The Sonics need his tenacity and ability to draw fouls, they don’t need his constant complaining and ridiculous fouls.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/round-one-report-card.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/round-one-report-card.php</guid>
<category>Danny Fortson</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 20:03:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media Watch: April Edition</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img src="http://www.supersonicsoul.com/IGNcollison.jpg" style="width: 405px; height: 249px;">
<br>
<span style="font-style: italic;font-size:78%;">Horked from www.sports.IGN.com</span>
<br>
<br>The Bad News: So the Supes are limping, figuratively and literally, into the playoffs.<br>The Good News: They're finally getting some pub. Check the linkage:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://sports.ign.com/?fromint=1" style="font-weight: bold;">>IGN Interview with Nick Collison</a>
<br>He's on the <a href="http://sports.ign.com/?fromint=1">front page</a> of their sports section even. And looky thar: they also chat with our old pal, <a href="http://sports.ign.com/articles/602/602070p1.html">GP</a>.<br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">>SLAM shows more love for the 206</span>
<br>I love when SLAM loves Seattle. But maybe there is such a thing as too much love. Like, ain't it strange how Ray Allen's hit a mini-slump since his face got plastered on the cover? Not content to put the voodoo on just the Sonics' best player, this month's issue of SLAM might just hex the entire city:<br>
<ul> <li>Sonics PG duo of Luke "Frodo" Ridnour and Antonio Daniels featured<br>
</li>
<li>City Game section sizes up Seattle's game through the years and at all levels of comp. There's some nice reminiscing here--Seattle U's Elgin Baylor (not the Clips'), Spencer Haywood, '79 Sonics, Reign Man, the Storm even. Worth the $4.99 cover price alone.<br>
</li>  <li>Piece on Franklin High alum Jason Terry</li>
<li>Open letter to ex-Gonzaga Bulldog, Dan "The Disaster" Dickau, tracing the unspoken "beef" between the mag and he.<br>
</li> </ul>Oh, and visit <a href="http://www.slamonline.com/index.html">www.slamonline.com</a> and you'll find those same articles, plus the online edition of last month's issue, including the Ray Allen feature.<ul> </ul>
<a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/3520226?GT1=6335" style="font-weight: bold;">>Fox Sports.com</a>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">: Best pro teams to not win a championship</span>
<br>The 95-96 Sonics come in at number 9 in the top 10. Not exactly pub for the current team, and not really a good thing to be recognized for, but it's Sonics pub nonetheless. The 2001 Mariners are No. 3.</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/media-watch-april-edition.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/media-watch-april-edition.php</guid>
<category>Jason Terry</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:02:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Around the Net</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This stuff is all meaningless rumors and speculation, but, hey, isn   t that what the internet is all about?
<br>
<br>A website that tracks the upcoming <a href="http://www.nbadraft.net/index.asp">NBA draft</a> has the Sonics selecting UW   s Nate Robinson with the 29th pick in the draft ... In between checking on his 6,700 business endeavors, <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/sonics/2002139647_kell04.html">Magic Johnson found time</a> to check out the Sonics/Heat the other night. Apparently, Ridnour is the sole reason for Seattle   s success this season. Anyone else wondering if the fact Magic played PG has any influence on his opinion? ... Reggie Evans is out with stomach flu for a couple of nights. That sound you just heard was Nick Collison   s agent dialling Nate MacMillan. ... Radman has a backhanded swipe at GP   s leadership skills in relation to Allen   s same in the <a href="http://www.prosportsdaily.com/nba/sonics/">Washington Times</a>. Wonder if Radman thought Ray-Ray was such a great leader last season, when the Sonics had to watch the playoffs on TV? Funny, it seemed like GP was a good enough leader to take the Sonics to the Finals; it   s just too bad everyone in the organization seems to have forgotten that. And I   m guessing that all this warm and cuddly crap regarding Ray   s contract wouldn   t be so warm or cuddly if the Sonics were 6-23 instead of 23-6 ... Allen has moved up to 5th in the <a href="http://www.82games.com/rolandratings0405.htm">Roland Rankings</a>, trailing only Bryant, Nowitzki, Kirilenko, and Marbury.
<br>
</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/around-the-net.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/around-the-net.php</guid>
<category>Orlando Magic</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:11:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sonics withstand Heat, 98-96</title>
<description><![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img alt="Miami Heat's Eddie Jones, left, is fouled by Seattle SuperSonics' Nick Collison in the first quarter Monday, Jan. 3, 2005, in Miami. (AP Photo/Alan Diaz)" src="http://www.supersonicsoul.com/heat.jpg">
<br>
<span style="font-size:78%;">Eddie Jones faces the Sonics' dreaded 15-Finger Defense
<br>
</span>
<br>The Seattle Supersonics beat the Miami Heat 98-96 Monday night in Miami to end the Heat's franchise-record 14-game winning streak.  Miami had a chance to send the game to O.T., but with 0.4 seconds remaining, Eddie Jones missed two out of three free throws that would have tied the game.
<br>
<br>Miami had several chances to win or tie the game down the stretch, but were denied each time by the tough Sonics "D". Jones missed a desperation three with 0.4 seconds left on the clock, but was fouled (<span style="font-style:italic;">Nooooo!!!</span>) by Rashard Lewis.  
<br>
<br>With a chance to tie the game, E.J. took the ball, strode right up to the free throw line and, without pausing to contemplate the importance of the shot he was about to take, tossed up a rushed and off-target free throw, thereby sealing Miami's doom.  
<br>
<br>The two teams will have a rematch this Sunday back in Seattle.
<br>
</div>

            ]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sonics-withstand-heat-9896.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sonics-withstand-heat-9896.php</guid>
<category>Seattle Sonics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:30:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sonics cured by Nuggets</title>
<description>    Ray Allen was at a full sprint, his hands out like a wide receiver awaiting the pass from Nick Collison to start the fast break.
            </description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sonics-cured-by-nuggets.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/sonics-cured-by-nuggets.php</guid>
<category>Seattle Sonics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Something Ain&apos;t Right...</title>
<description><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Take a guess who is in the top 5 in team scoring. C'mon, I dare ya. <strong >Dallas Mavericks?</strong> Sorry, no, they're 6th. The <strong >Kings?</strong> pfft! Not even in the top half. OK, stop embarassing yourself. Yeah, the <strong >Heat, </strong>with <strong >Dwayne Wade</strong> and <strong >Shaq, </strong>that's not a huge surprise. And the <strong >Suns</strong>, with <strong >Amare, Steve Nash, Joe Johnson, </strong>and <strong >The Matrix</strong>, well that's reasonable. But the other three teams? How about this: <strong >Charlotte, Washington, </strong>and <strong >Seattle.</strong> Shazam! Who the heck is putting the ball in the basket for these guys? Let's have a look-see:
<br ></br>
<br ></br>
<strong >Charlotte</strong>
<br ></br>OK, so they're also giving up the 3rd-most points in the league, but admit it, you thought these guys would struggle to score 80 points on most nights. Their marquee player, <strong >Emeka Okafor</strong>, is a defense-first center. Their shooting guard, <strong >Gerald Wallace, </strong>shoots about 55% <em >from the free-throw line.</em> So what's going on? First of all, <strong >Primoz Brezec </strong>is scoring 18.3 ppg (beating his career high by 16.3 points), hitting nearly 2/3 of his shots. <strong >Jason Hart</strong> is dishing the ball to the tune of 9.7 apg, and they're sharing the ball: 6 players are averaging in double figures, and one other is averaging 9.7.
<br ></br>Don't expect this to keep up, though. Brezec is good, sure, but not .595 fg% good. Expect him to settle down to 14 ppg, maintaining his 8 boards, and very little else. Hart will <em >not</em> keep up his torrid assist pace, but he'll be worth having on your team. Look for 12/3/6 with a steal or two and a three here or there. A good utility player.
<br ></br>The gem of this team is Okafor. Definitely. Listen to this, and guess who player X is: "a 6-10 All-America center ... he came out of college with his defensive skills fully developed, but he surprised NBA observers with a sophisticated offensive repertoire." Sounds like Okafor, but really it's an early report on <strong >Alonzo Mourning.</strong> And I think that's right where Okafor is headed. He's not gonna dominate like Zo from the get-go, but he certainly will get his fair share of looks at the basket - look for 15/12 with 2.5-3 bpg. He's the real deal - and maybe the only one on the team.
<br ></br>
<br ></br>
<strong >Seattle</strong>
<br ></br>The biggest surprise in the NBA, the Sonics are 4-1 and blowing away all of the preseason predictions. While <strong >Ray Allen</strong>'s output isn't a surprise, <strong >Rashard Lewis</strong> has been scoring at about 5-6 ppg higher than his norm. Neither of these guys are really any more or less valuable than they were on draft day, but there are some guys to be scouring for on the waiver wire.
<br ></br>The big shocker is <strong >Danny Fortson</strong>, who has come out of nowhere to average 9.8 boards - in just 17.5 minutes. That's a ridiculous rate, but not totally unpredictable. Remember, he's the guy who averaged a double-double for the <strong >Warriors </strong>a couple times. Look for him to get more minutes as he continues to clean up the glass, especially on the offensive side. Also look for him to sucker-push foriegners, like he did to <strong >Zarko Cabarkapa</strong> last year.
<br ></br>There are two very solid second-year guys on this team who are worth keeping tabs on. <strong >Luke Ridnour</strong>, the point guard from Oregon, earned the starting job to start the year, and is starting to earn more minutes with his play. He still turns the ball over a little too much, but if he continues to ward of <strong >Antonio Daniels</strong> for minutes, he'll be a fine util/backup PG, getting about 12 and 7 or so, with a three and a couple steals.
<br ></br>The other second-year man is <strong >Nick Collison, </strong>who is nowhere near ready to be picked up. But they like this kid a lot, and he's already rebounding well. Look for him to start getting more minutes as the year carries on, especially if <strong >Vladimir Radmanovic</strong> is traded.
<br ></br>
<br ></br>
<strong >Washington</strong>
<br ></br>Another score-all-the-time team, the Wizards are stacked with scorers. The trifecta of <strong >Antawn Jamison, Gilbert Arenas, </strong>and <strong >Larry Hughes</strong> should all average over 18 points per game. <strong >Jarvis Hayes </strong>and <strong >Juan Dixon </strong>should each hit double digits themselves.  And that's without <strong >Kwame Brown</strong> or <strong >Etan Thomas</strong> in the lineup.  Sure there's not much defense going on, but hey, who likes defense?  This is fantasy basketball, not real basketball.
<br ></br>The first three players mentioned above should be on a roster in every league.  After that, it's hard to tell.  There are going to be battles for minutes at a number of positions once Kwame, Etan and <strong >Steve Blake</strong> return to the court.  The obvious losers are going to be Dixon and <strong >Brendan Haywood</strong>, who has a great chance to show the Wizards they weren't crazy to give him an extension last week.  Haywood could be a nice short-term pickup, but they also spent a good deal of money to keep Thomas around, so they'll likely split time - and be useless to your fantasy squad.
<br ></br>Here's an interesting trade.  How about the expiring contract of Larry Hughes and Kwame Brown for Ron Artest and Jeff Foster?  I'm just saying, is all.
<br ></br>
</div>
]]></description>
<link>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/something-aint-right.php</link>
<guid>http://www.hooplog.com/nba/something-aint-right.php</guid>
<category>Joe Johnson</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:48:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
